An official website of the United States government
18-346-CHI
Wednesday, April 18, 2018
North Dakota’s only large county, Cass, had an average weekly wage of $934 in the third quarter of 2017, 1.6 percent lower than one year ago, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are defined as those with 2016 annual average employment levels of 75,000 or more.) Nationally, the average weekly wage decreased 0.6 percent over the year to $1,021 in the third quarter of 2017. Assistant Commissioner for Regional Operations Charlene Peiffer noted that although Cass County’s wages were below the U.S. average, nine of the state’s smaller counties, those with employment below 75,000, had wages above that for the nation. (See table 1.)
Employment in Cass County fell 0.1 percent from September 2016 to September 2017. Cass County’s employment level of 118,400 accounted for 28.2 percent of total employment within the state. Nationally, employment rose 1.0 percent during this 12-month period, as 283 of the 346 largest U.S. counties gained jobs. Nationwide, the 346 largest counties made up 72.7 percent of total U.S. employment.
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 52 smaller counties in North Dakota. Average weekly wages varied among these counties, with four having wages above $1,300 and two with wages under $550. (See table 2.)
Large county wage changesCass County (-1.6 percent) was 1 of the 265 largest U.S. counties to record an over-the-year decrease in average weekly wages. Mercer, N.J., had the largest wage drop, down 8.8 percent from the third quarter of 2016. Wyandotte, Kan., was second with a wage decrease of 6.0 percent, followed by Clark, Nev. (-5.3 percent); Somerset, N.J. (-5.0 percent), and Clay, Mo. (-4.8 percent).
Among the largest U.S. counties, 71 experienced over-the-year increases in average weekly wages. Midland, Texas, had the largest percentage increase in average weekly wages (8.4 percent), followed by Union, N.J. (8.2 percent); Elkhart, Ind. (6.5 percent); Forsyth, N.C. (5.3 percent); and Maui + Kalawao, Hawaii (4.6 percent).
Large county average weekly wagesCass County’s $934 average weekly wage placed in the middle third among the 346 largest U.S. counties, ranking 176th. Santa Clara, Calif., held the top position among the highest-paid large counties in the nation with an average weekly wage of $2,320. San Mateo, Calif., was second at $2,123, followed by San Francisco, Calif. ($1,954); New York, N.Y. ($1,889); and Washington, D.C. ($1,759). Among the largest U.S. counties, Cameron, Texas ($612), had the lowest wage, followed by the counties of Horry, S.C. ($633); Hidalgo, Texas ($649); and Webb, Texas ($672).
Average weekly wages in North Dakota’s smaller countiesForty-three of the 52 counties in North Dakota with employment below 75,000 had average weekly wages lower than the national average of $1,021. Nine small counties had above-average wages, all located in the western portion of the state. The highest wage was in Williams County at $1,428, followed by McKenzie ($1,347) and Oliver ($1,335). Sheridan County had the lowest wage in the state, averaging $466 in the third quarter of 2017. (See table 2.)
When all 53 counties in North Dakota were considered, 10 had average weekly wages of $649 or lower, 12 had wages from $650 to $749, 14 had wages from $750 to $849, and 17 had wages of $850 or higher. (See chart 1.)
Additional statistics and other informationQCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2016 edition of this publication contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2017 version of the national news release. Tables and additional content from Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online are now available at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2016/home.htm. The 2017 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2018.
The County Employment and Wages release for fourth quarter 2017 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, May 23, 2018.
The national QCEW publication process is accelerating for a more timely release. Beginning with the national fourth quarter 2017 release, QCEW data will be published in two parts. The current County Employment and Wages news release and associated data will be accelerated and published first. The full QCEW data release will occur two weeks later, accompanied by a data release notice.
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The 9.9 million employer reports cover 144.5 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.
Area | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 2017 (thousands) | Percent change, September 2016-17 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level (3) | Percent change, third quarter 2016-17 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | |
United States (4) |
144,464.4 | 1.0 | -- | $1,021 | -- | -0.6 | -- |
North Dakota |
419.2 | -1.0 | -- | 953 | 22 | -1.2 | 34 |
Cass, N.D. |
118.4 | -0.1 | 287 | 934 | 176 | -1.6 | 217 |
Footnotes: |
|||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Area | Employment September 2017 | Average weekly wage(1) |
---|---|---|
United States(2) |
144,464,425 | $1,021 |
North Dakota |
419,248 | 953 |
Adams |
962 | 755 |
Barnes |
4,506 | 721 |
Benson |
1,990 | 733 |
Billings |
657 | 645 |
Bottineau |
2,526 | 783 |
Bowman |
1,526 | 755 |
Burke |
676 | 1,008 |
Burleigh |
56,799 | 946 |
Cass |
118,390 | 934 |
Cavalier |
1,455 | 776 |
Dickey |
1,916 | 669 |
Divide |
840 | 946 |
Dunn |
2,114 | 1,290 |
Eddy |
744 | 620 |
Emmons |
998 | 632 |
Foster |
1,656 | 800 |
Golden Valley |
652 | 665 |
Grand Forks |
41,132 | 851 |
Grant |
542 | 644 |
Griggs |
868 | 660 |
Hettinger |
724 | 798 |
Kidder |
724 | 639 |
LaMoure |
1,426 | 679 |
Logan |
632 | 546 |
McHenry |
1,319 | 816 |
McIntosh |
1,090 | 634 |
McKenzie |
9,447 | 1,347 |
McLean |
3,556 | 1,054 |
Mercer |
5,195 | 1,318 |
Morton |
11,143 | 844 |
Mountrail |
5,689 | 1,228 |
Nelson |
1,010 | 614 |
Oliver |
720 | 1,335 |
Pembina |
3,756 | 869 |
Pierce |
1,738 | 719 |
Ramsey |
5,868 | 746 |
Ransom |
2,046 | 667 |
Renville |
741 | 757 |
Richland |
7,899 | 776 |
Rolette |
4,366 | 701 |
Sargent |
3,108 | 799 |
Sheridan |
252 | 466 |
Sioux |
1,626 | 801 |
Slope |
131 | 1,140 |
Stark |
18,788 | 1,119 |
Steele |
624 | 898 |
Stutsman |
11,341 | 801 |
Towner |
735 | 701 |
Traill |
3,485 | 773 |
Walsh |
5,362 | 740 |
Ward |
31,574 | 913 |
Wells |
1,565 | 639 |
Williams |
28,108 | 1,428 |
Footnotes |
||
NOTE: Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. Data are preliminary. |
State | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 2017 (thousands) | Percent change, September 2016-17 | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level | Percent change, third quarter 2016-17 | National ranking by percent change | |
United States (2) |
144,464.4 | 1.0 | $1,021 | -- | -0.6 | -- |
Alabama |
1,941.1 | 0.8 | 859 | 37 | -1.3 | 38 |
Alaska |
335.4 | -0.7 | 1,025 | 15 | -2.8 | 50 |
Arizona |
2,760.1 | 2.4 | 948 | 24 | -0.2 | 10 |
Arkansas |
1,213.0 | 0.6 | 788 | 49 | -0.6 | 19 |
California |
17,153.4 | 1.7 | 1,215 | 4 | 0.5 | 4 |
Colorado |
2,625.9 | 1.9 | 1,067 | 9 | 0.5 | 4 |
Connecticut |
1,676.3 | 0.1 | 1,179 | 6 | -2.2 | 47 |
Delaware |
443.0 | 0.4 | 1,026 | 14 | 0.4 | 6 |
District of Columbia |
764.7 | 0.7 | 1,759 | 1 | 1.3 | 2 |
Florida |
8,305.8 | -0.2 | 896 | 29 | -1.1 | 31 |
Georgia |
4,343.5 | 1.3 | 961 | 21 | -0.9 | 27 |
Hawaii |
652.5 | 0.4 | 953 | 22 | -0.3 | 13 |
Idaho |
722.3 | 2.7 | 778 | 50 | -0.5 | 16 |
Illinois |
5,969.6 | 0.5 | 1,057 | 10 | -0.3 | 13 |
Indiana |
3,044.0 | 0.6 | 861 | 36 | -0.6 | 19 |
Iowa |
1,546.1 | -0.2 | 855 | 38 | -2.2 | 47 |
Kansas |
1,376.4 | -0.1 | 839 | 41 | -2.1 | 46 |
Kentucky |
1,890.4 | 0.5 | 837 | 42 | -2.4 | 49 |
Louisiana |
1,904.3 | -0.1 | 869 | 33 | -1.7 | 42 |
Maine |
621.9 | 0.7 | 821 | 46 | -0.5 | 16 |
Maryland |
2,661.8 | 0.5 | 1,105 | 8 | -1.7 | 42 |
Massachusetts |
3,568.0 | 0.9 | 1,265 | 2 | -0.9 | 27 |
Michigan |
4,334.3 | 0.9 | 964 | 20 | -1.1 | 31 |
Minnesota |
2,883.0 | 1.1 | 1,030 | 13 | -2.0 | 45 |
Mississippi |
1,129.1 | -0.1 | 729 | 51 | -1.4 | 39 |
Missouri |
2,805.8 | 0.9 | 878 | 31 | -1.2 | 34 |
Montana |
468.6 | 0.9 | 793 | 48 | 0.1 | 8 |
Nebraska |
973.3 | -0.2 | 850 | 39 | -0.8 | 23 |
Nevada |
1,337.7 | 2.9 | 914 | 26 | -3.8 | 51 |
New Hampshire |
659.1 | 0.6 | 1,022 | 16 | -0.4 | 15 |
New Jersey |
4,043.6 | 1.1 | 1,156 | 7 | -1.5 | 41 |
New Mexico |
816.0 | 0.3 | 823 | 45 | -0.8 | 23 |
New York |
9,329.8 | 1.2 | 1,219 | 3 | -0.2 | 10 |
North Carolina |
4,348.0 | 1.3 | 904 | 27 | -0.7 | 21 |
North Dakota |
419.2 | -1.0 | 953 | 22 | -1.2 | 34 |
Ohio |
5,383.6 | 0.6 | 920 | 25 | -0.8 | 23 |
Oklahoma |
1,593.3 | 0.7 | 843 | 40 | -1.2 | 34 |
Oregon |
1,905.3 | 1.8 | 969 | 19 | -0.1 | 9 |
Pennsylvania |
5,836.5 | 1.0 | 1,002 | 17 | -1.1 | 31 |
Rhode Island |
484.5 | 0.8 | 973 | 18 | -1.8 | 44 |
South Carolina |
2,027.2 | 0.8 | 828 | 43 | -0.5 | 16 |
South Dakota |
426.2 | 0.4 | 803 | 47 | -0.7 | 21 |
Tennessee |
2,953.3 | 1.1 | 903 | 28 | -1.2 | 34 |
Texas |
12,008.9 | 1.4 | 1,032 | 12 | -1.0 | 29 |
Utah |
1,444.1 | 2.6 | 879 | 30 | -0.2 | 10 |
Vermont |
310.3 | 0.1 | 869 | 33 | -1.4 | 39 |
Virginia |
3,843.6 | 1.0 | 1,053 | 11 | -0.8 | 23 |
Washington |
3,343.4 | 2.0 | 1,208 | 5 | 1.7 | 1 |
West Virginia |
694.0 | 0.2 | 826 | 44 | 1.1 | 3 |
Wisconsin |
2,866.9 | 0.5 | 876 | 32 | -1.0 | 29 |
Wyoming |
276.2 | 0.3 | 868 | 35 | 0.3 | 7 |
Puerto Rico |
862.8 | -3.1 | 509 | (3) | -2.7 | (3) |
Virgin Islands |
36.9 | -1.1 | 763 | (3) | -1.9 | (3) |
Footnotes: |
||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Covered employment and wages includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Last Modified Date: Wednesday, April 18, 2018