Comparing metro area unemployment rates to the national rate of 5.6% in July 2015
September 04, 2015
In July 2015, total of 187 metro areas had unemployment rates below the U.S. figure of 5.6 percent. 185 areas had rates above it, and 15 areas had rates equal to that of the nation.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Bismarck, North Dakota, had the lowest unemployment rate in July, 2.3 percent. Yuma, Arizona (26.6 percent), and El Centro, California (24.2 percent), had the highest unemployment rates.
Of the 51 metropolitan areas with a 2010 Census population of 1 million or more, Austin-Round Rock, Texas, had the lowest unemployment rate in July (3.5 percent). Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, California, had the highest jobless rate among the large areas (7.1 percent).
These data are from the Local Area Unemployment Statistics program. Data for the most recent month are preliminary and may be revised. The data are not seasonally adjusted. For more information, see “Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment — July 2015” (HTML) (PDF).
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, The Economics Daily, Comparing metro area unemployment rates to the national rate of 5.6% in July 2015 on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2015/comparing-metro-area-unemployment-rates-to-the-national-rate-in-july-2015.htm (visited July 21, 2019).
Recent editions of Spotlight on Statistics
- 25 years of Worker Injury, Illness, and Fatality Case Data
Examines detailed historical data on work-related injuries, illnesses, and fatal injuries.
- Occupational employment projections through the perspective of education and training
Examines employment, projected employment growth, and wages for occupations with different education and training requirements.
- Workers in Alternative Employment Arrangements
A look at independent contractors, on-call workers, temporary help agency workers, and workers provided by contract firms.
- Labor force characteristics of people with a disability
Examines the labor force characteristics of people with a disability and compares them with the characteristics of people with no disability.