Department of Labor Logo United States Department of Labor
Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

News Release Information

14-2013-CHI
Wednesday, November 05, 2014

Contacts Technical information: Media contact:
  • (312) 353-1138

Consumer Expenditures for the Chicago Metropolitan Area: 2012-2013

Consumer units in the Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, Ill.-Ind.-Wis., metropolitan area spent an average of $57,919 per year in 2012-2013, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Regional Commissioner Charlene Peiffer noted that this figure was 12.9 percent higher than the $51,299 average expenditure level for a typical household in the United States. Although households in the Chicago area spent more than the U.S. average, they allocated their dollars similarly to the U.S. in four of eight major categories, while differing significantly in four. For example, the share of expenditures for cash contributions, which accounted for 3.1 percent of a typical household’s budget in the Chicago area, was significantly less than the nationwide average of 3.7 percent. (See chart 1 and table 1.)

Housing in the Chicago metropolitan area averaged $20,527 annually and was the largest expenditure category, accounting for 35.4 percent of a Chicago area household’s total budget. This share was significantly above the 33.2-percent national average. (See tables 1 and 2.) Overall, 8 of the 18 published metropolitan areas had expenditure shares for housing significantly above the U.S. average. Only one area, Detroit, had a share for housing that was significantly below the U.S. average. (See chart 2.) Housing expenditures among the 18 areas ranged from 39.9 percent in Miami to 30.0 percent in Detroit. (See table 3.)

The majority of housing expenditures in the Chicago area went toward shelter, 63.6 percent, which includes mortgage interest, property taxes, repairs, and rent, among other items; nationwide, 58.6 percent of the average housing budget was allocated for shelter. (See table A.) Utilities, fuels, and public services expenses accounted for 18.3 percent of the housing budget locally; nationally, they made up 21.7 percent. The rate of homeownership in Chicago was 66 percent, compared to the U.S. average of 64 percent.

Table A. Percent distribution of housing expenditures, United States and Chicago metropolitan area, 2012-2013
Category United States Chicago

Total housing

100.0 100.0

Shelter

58.6 63.6

Utilities, fuels, and public services

21.7 18.3

Household operations

6.8 7.1

Housekeeping supplies

3.7 2.9

Household furnishings and equipment

9.2 8.2

Note: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding.
 

At 15.6 percent of the total budget, transportation was the second-largest expenditure category in the Chicago area and was significantly lower than the national average of 17.5 percent. Among the 18 published metropolitan areas nationwide, 6 (including Chicago) had below-average transportation shares. Two areas, Houston, and Detroit, had shares that were significantly above the national average at 21.0 and 19.7 percent, respectively. (See chart 3.)

Of the $9,026 in annual expenditures for transportation in Chicago, 91.4 percent was spent buying and maintaining private vehicles; this compared to the national average of 94 percent. The remaining 8.6 percent of a Chicago household’s transportation budget was spent on public transit, which includes fares for taxis, buses, trains, and planes, compared to the 6.0-percent average for the nation. (See table B.) The average number of vehicles per household in Chicago (1.7) was close to the national average (1.9).

Table B. Percent distribution of transportation expenditures, United States and Chicago metropolitan area, 2012-2013
Category United States Chicago

Transportation

100.0 100.0

Vehicle purchases (net outlays)

36.0 35.2

Gasoline and motor oil

29.8 30.8

Other vehicle expenses

28.2 25.4

Public transportation

6.0 8.6

Note: Columns may not add to 100 due to rounding. 
 

The portion of a Chicago consumer unit’s budget spent on food, 12.7 percent, was not significantly different than the 12.9-percent U.S. average. Among the 18 metropolitan areas, 6 had food expenditure shares that were significantly below the nationwide average. (See table 3.)

Households in Chicago spent $4,601, or 62.4 percent, of their food dollars on food prepared at home and the remaining 37.6 percent ($2,772) on food prepared away from home, such as restaurant meals, carry-out, board at school, and catered affairs. In comparison, the typical U.S. household spent 59.8 percent of its food budget on food prepared at home and 40.2 percent on food prepared away from home.

As noted, Chicago is 1 of 18 metropolitan areas nationwide for which Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) data are available. Metropolitan area CE data and that for the four geographic regions of the United States are available on our Web site at https://www.bls.gov/cex/tables.htm. Metropolitan area CE news releases are available at https://www.bls.gov/regions/subjects/consumer-spending.htm.

Additional Information

Data contained in this release are from the CE, which is conducted on an ongoing basis by the U.S. Census Bureau for the BLS. The CE data in this release were averaged over a two-year period, 2012 and 2013. CE data are available for the nation, the 4 geographic regions of the country, and 18 metropolitan areas. The metropolitan area discussed in this release is Chicago-Gary-Kenosha, Ill.-Ind.-Wis., which is comprised of Cook, DeKalb, DuPage, Grundy, Kane, Kankakee, Kendall, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties in Illinois; Lake, Newton, and Porter Counties in Indiana; and Kenosha County in Wisconsin.

The survey consists of two components, a diary or recordkeeping survey, and an interview survey. The integrated data from the BLS Diary and Interview Surveys provide a complete accounting of consumer expenditures and income, which neither survey component alone is designed to do. Due to changes in the survey sample frame, metropolitan area data in this release are not directly comparable to those prior to 1996.

A consumer unit is defined as members of a household related by blood, marriage, adoption, or other legal arrangement; a single person living alone or sharing a household with others but who is financially independent; or two or more persons living together who share responsibility for at least 2 out of 3 major types of expenses – food, housing, and other expenses. The terms household or consumer unit are used interchangeably for convenience.

CE metropolitan area estimates are not comparative cost of living surveys, as neither the quantity nor the quality of goods and services has been held constant among areas. Differences may result from variations in demographic characteristics such as consumer unit size, age, preferences, income levels, etc. However, expenditure shares, or the percentage of a consumer unit’s budget spent on a particular category, can be used to compare spending patterns across areas. Sample sizes for the metropolitan areas are much smaller than for the nation, so the U.S. estimates and year-to-year changes are more reliable than those for the metropolitan areas. Users should also keep in mind that prices for many goods and services have changed since the survey was conducted.

Expenditure shares for housing and transportation that are above or below that for the nation after testing for significance at the 95-percent confidence interval are also identified in charts 2 and 3 for the 18 metropolitan areas surveyed.

A value that is statistically different from another does not necessarily mean that the difference has economic or practical significance. Statistical significance is concerned with our ability to make confident statements about a universe based on a sample. It is entirely possible that a large difference between two values is not significantly different statistically, while a small difference is, since both the size and heterogeneity of the sample affect the relative error of the data being tested.

For additional technical and related information, see www.bls.gov/opub/hom/cex/home.htm.

Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; Federal Relay Service: 800-877-8339.

Table 1. Percent distribution of average annual expenditures, United States and Chicago metropolitan area, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2012-2013
CategoryUnited StatesChicago

Average annual expenditures

$51,299*$57,919

Percent distribution:

100.0100.0

Food

12.912.7

Alcoholic beverages

0.90.8

Housing

33.2*35.4

Apparel and services

3.33.6

Transportation

17.5*15.6

Healthcare

7.06.9

Entertainment

5.0*4.6

Personal care products and services

1.21.1

Reading

0.20.2

Education

2.3*3.7

Tobacco products and smoking supplies

0.6*0.4

Miscellaneous

1.41.4

Cash contributions

3.7*3.1

Personal insurance and pensions

10.810.6

* Statistically significant difference from the U.S. average at the 95-percent confidence level.
Note: Numbers may not add to 100 due to rounding.
 

Table 2. Consumer unit characteristics and average annual expenditures, United States and Chicago metropolitan area, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2012-2013
CategoryUnited StatesChicago

Consumer unit characteristics:

 

Income before taxes

$64,686$74,908

Age of reference person

50.150.0
 

Average number in consumer unit:

 

Persons

2.52.6

Children under 18

0.60.6

Persons 65 and over

0.30.3

Earners

1.31.3

Vehicles

1.91.7
 

Percent homeowners

6466
 

Average annual expenditures

$51,299$57,919

Food

6,6007,373

Food at home

3,9494,601

Cereals and bakery products

541664

Meats, poultry, fish, and eggs

854973

Dairy products

416427

Fruits and vegetables

741938

Other food at home

1,3971,598

Food away from home

2,6512,772

Alcoholic beverages

448436

Housing

17,03020,527

Shelter

9,98613,054

Owned dwellings

6,0828,252

Rented dwellings

3,2553,762

Other lodging

6491,040

Utilities, fuels, and public services

3,6933,751

Household operations

1,1521,456

Housekeeping supplies

627593

Household furnishings and equipment

1,5711,674

Apparel and services

1,6772,084

Transportation

9,0019,026

Vehicle purchases (net outlay)

3,2413,176

Gasoline and motor oil

2,6832,780

Other vehicle expenses

2,5372,291

Public transportation

540778

Healthcare

3,5943,982

Entertainment

2,5532,644

Personal care products and services

618650

Reading

106114

Education

1,1722,150

Tobacco products and smoking supplies

331237

Miscellaneous

736801

Cash contributions

1,8731,781

Personal insurance and pensions

5,5596,114

Life and other personal insurance

336448

Pensions and Social Security

5,2245,665
Table 3. Percent share of average annual expenditures for housing, transportation, and food, United States and 18 metropolitan areas, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2012-2013
AreaHousingTransportationFood

United States

33.217.512.9

Atlanta

33.417.112.6

Baltimore

32.515.511.0*

Boston

32.615.6*13.3

Chicago

35.4*15.6*12.7

Cleveland

31.618.212.8

Dallas

33.517.912.6

Detroit

30.0*19.7*13.5

Houston

33.121.0*12.0

Los Angeles

38.2*15.4*13.4

Miami

39.9*16.214.0

Minneapolis

32.018.311.3*

New York

39.8*13.5*11.9*

Philadelphia

35.4*15.4*13.7

Phoenix

34.818.913.6

San Diego

38.2*15.811.5*

San Francisco

35.8*13.7*11.9*

Seattle

33.415.613.0

Washington

35.316.710.9*

* Statistically significant difference from the U.S. average at the 95-percent confidence level.
 

 

Last Modified Date: Wednesday, November 05, 2014