An official website of the United States government
20-1155-CHI
Monday, July 13, 2020
Employment rose in Nebraska’s two large counties from December 2018 to December 2019, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. (Large counties are those with annual average employment levels of 75,000 or more in 2018.) Acting Regional Commissioner Julie Wilson noted that employment increased 0.8 percent over the year in Douglas County and 0.5 percent in Lancaster County. (See table 1.)
Nationally, employment increased 1.2 percent over the year with 285 of the 355 largest U.S. counties reporting increases. Cleveland, OK, had the largest percentage increase in the country, up 5.8 percent over the year. Ector, TX, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment with a loss of 4.2 percent.
Among the two largest counties in Nebraska, employment was highest in Douglas County (346,300) in December 2019. Lancaster County had an employment level of 174,100. Together, the two largest Nebraska counties accounted for 52.5 percent of total employment within the state. Nationwide, the 355 largest counties made up 73.7 percent of total U.S. employment.
The two large Nebraska counties reported average weekly wage gains from the fourth quarter of 2018 to the fourth quarter of 2019, with the faster rate of increase in Douglas County, up 5.2 percent. In Lancaster County, average weekly wages rose 5.0 percent. Douglas County had an average weekly wage of $1,091. The average weekly wage in Lancaster County was $948. Nationally, the average weekly wage increased 3.5 percent from a year ago to $1,185 in the fourth quarter of 2019.
Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 91 counties in Nebraska with employment below 75,000. Wage levels in all of these smaller counties were below the national average in December 2019, with one exception, Stanton ($1,244). (See table 2.)
Large county wage changesThe 5.2-percent annual average weekly wage gain in Douglas County ranked 33rd among the nation’s 355 largest counties in the fourth quarter of 2019. The 5.0-percent wage gain in Lancaster County ranked 45th.
Nationally, 341 of the 355 largest counties had over-the-year wage increases. Santa Cruz, CA, had the largest percentage wage increase (20.7 percent). The remaining 14 large counties had wage declines during the period. Linn, IA, had the largest over-the-year percentage decrease (-7.1 percent).
Large county average weekly wagesWeekly wages in the state’s two large counties were below the national average of $1,185 in the fourth quarter of 2019. Average weekly wages in Douglas County ($1,091) and Lancaster County ($948) ranked 160th and 285th, respectively.
Nationally, 93 large counties reported average weekly wages at or above the U.S. average in the fourth quarter of 2019. Santa Clara, CA, had the highest average weekly wage at $2,825. Average weekly wages were below the national average in 262 counties. At $701 a week, Cameron, TX, had the lowest average weekly wage.
Average weekly wages in Nebraska’s smaller countiesAll 91 smaller counties in Nebraska–those with employment below 75,000–reported average weekly wages below the national average of $1,185, with the exception of Stanton ($1,244). Other smaller counties with average wages above $1,000 included Nemaha ($1,038), Washington ($1,025), Dakota ($1,006), and Boyd ($1,003). Loup County reported the lowest average wage in the state at $478 per week, followed by Hooker County at $496 per week.
When all 93 counties in Nebraska were considered, 4 reported average weekly wages of less than $600, 15 registered wages from $600 to $699, 32 had wages from $700 to $799, 28 had wages from $800 to $899, and 14 had average weekly wages of $900 or more. (See chart 1.)
Additional statistics and other informationQCEW data for states have been included in this release in table 3. For additional information about quarterly employment and wages data, please read the Technical Note or visit www.bls.gov/cew.
Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2018 edition of this publication, which was published in September 2019, contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2019 version of this news release. Tables and additional content from the 2018 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online are now available at www.bls.gov/cew/publications/employment-and-wages-annual-averages/2018/home.htm. The 2019 edition of Employment and Wages Annual Averages Online will be available in September 2020.
The County Employment and Wages release for first quarter 2020 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, August 19, 2020. The County Employment and Wages full data update for first quarter 2020 is scheduled to be released on Wednesday, September 2, 2020.
Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from summaries of employment and total pay of workers covered by state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) legislation and provided by State Workforce Agencies (SWAs). The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/. However, data in QCEW press releases have been revised and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.
QCEW data are not designed as a time series. QCEW data are simply the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. Establishments can move in or out of a county or industry for a number of reasons–some reflecting economic events, others reflecting administrative changes.
The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. These potential differences result from the states’ continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.
Area | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2019 (thousands) | Percent change, December 2018-19 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level (3) | Percent change, fourth quarter 2018-19 (2) | National ranking by percent change (3) | |
United States (4) | 149,857.1 | 1.2 | -- | $1,185 | -- | 3.5 | -- |
Nebraska | 990.9 | 0.7 | -- | 969 | 38 | 4.2 | 6 |
Douglas | 346.3 | 0.8 | 199 | 1,091 | 160 | 5.2 | 33 |
Lancaster | 174.1 | 0.5 | 231 | 948 | 285 | 5.0 | 45 |
Footnotes: | |||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Area | Employment December 2019 | Average weekly wage(1) |
---|---|---|
United States(2) | 149,857,130 | $1,185 |
Nebraska | 990,927 | 969 |
Adams | 15,233 | 846 |
Antelope | 2,354 | 784 |
Arthur | 93 | 516 |
Banner | 114 | 775 |
Blaine | 121 | 759 |
Boone | 2,399 | 840 |
Box Butte | 3,734 | 762 |
Boyd | 610 | 1,003 |
Brown | 1,257 | 746 |
Buffalo | 27,184 | 819 |
Burt | 1,751 | 747 |
Butler | 2,593 | 841 |
Cass | 5,716 | 797 |
Cedar | 2,662 | 777 |
Chase | 1,846 | 808 |
Cherry | 2,148 | 654 |
Cheyenne | 4,155 | 782 |
Clay | 2,315 | 923 |
Colfax | 5,102 | 938 |
Cuming | 3,790 | 873 |
Custer | 4,459 | 812 |
Dakota | 12,546 | 1,006 |
Dawes | 3,046 | 688 |
Dawson | 11,535 | 855 |
Deuel | 525 | 690 |
Dixon | 1,764 | 803 |
Dodge | 17,768 | 852 |
Douglas | 346,262 | 1,091 |
Dundy | 569 | 832 |
Fillmore | 2,222 | 883 |
Franklin | 730 | 750 |
Frontier | 853 | 697 |
Furnas | 1,874 | 800 |
Gage | 8,984 | 776 |
Garden | 470 | 704 |
Garfield | 807 | 692 |
Gosper | 376 | 791 |
Grant | 267 | 713 |
Greeley | 603 | 692 |
Hall | 34,672 | 837 |
Hamilton | 3,571 | 917 |
Harlan | 814 | 709 |
Hayes | 216 | 647 |
Hitchcock | 652 | 766 |
Holt | 4,442 | 786 |
Hooker | 305 | 496 |
Howard | 1,559 | 737 |
Jefferson | 3,346 | 755 |
Johnson | 1,489 | 831 |
Kearney | 2,236 | 776 |
Keith | 3,231 | 720 |
Keya Paha | 136 | 580 |
Kimball | 1,406 | 774 |
Knox | 2,918 | 725 |
Lancaster | 174,108 | 948 |
Lincoln | 14,292 | 811 |
Logan | 196 | 631 |
Loup | 123 | 478 |
Madison | 22,262 | 857 |
McPherson | 77 | 651 |
Merrick | 2,241 | 873 |
Morrill | 1,525 | 810 |
Nance | 1,008 | 725 |
Nemaha | 3,110 | 1,038 |
Nuckolls | 1,427 | 697 |
Otoe | 6,214 | 807 |
Pawnee | 767 | 749 |
Perkins | 1,157 | 907 |
Phelps | 4,741 | 917 |
Pierce | 1,900 | 803 |
Platte | 19,277 | 916 |
Polk | 1,478 | 778 |
Red Willow | 4,980 | 771 |
Richardson | 2,479 | 710 |
Rock | 464 | 695 |
Saline | 7,015 | 865 |
Sarpy | 74,314 | 971 |
Saunders | 5,511 | 818 |
Scotts Bluff | 16,227 | 817 |
Seward | 6,015 | 871 |
Sheridan | 1,669 | 714 |
Sherman | 748 | 633 |
Sioux | 156 | 717 |
Stanton | 1,333 | 1,244 |
Thayer | 2,281 | 827 |
Thomas | 252 | 625 |
Thurston | 3,005 | 881 |
Valley | 1,858 | 731 |
Washington | 7,724 | 1,025 |
Wayne | 4,448 | 697 |
Webster | 1,044 | 691 |
Wheeler | 319 | 750 |
York | 7,418 | 860 |
Footnotes | ||
NOTE: Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
State | Employment | Average weekly wage (1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
December 2019 (thousands) | Percent change, December 2018-19 | Average weekly wage | National ranking by level | Percent change, fourth quarter 2018-19 | National ranking by percent change | |
United States (2) | 149,857.1 | 1.2 | $1,185 | -- | 3.5 | -- |
Alabama | 2,007.9 | 1.0 | 985 | 36 | 2.6 | 39 |
Alaska | 309.9 | 0.6 | 1,139 | 16 | 3.2 | 27 |
Arizona | 2,999.8 | 2.7 | 1,059 | 23 | 4.1 | 7 |
Arkansas | 1,232.9 | 0.5 | 898 | 50 | 3.2 | 27 |
California | 17,836.3 | 1.5 | 1,457 | 4 | 4.7 | 4 |
Colorado | 2,772.6 | 2.2 | 1,227 | 9 | 4.0 | 8 |
Connecticut | 1,687.4 | -0.7 | 1,383 | 5 | 3.8 | 11 |
Delaware | 455.3 | 0.8 | 1,136 | 17 | 2.6 | 39 |
District of Columbia | 782.5 | 0.8 | 1,992 | 1 | 2.5 | 42 |
Florida | 9,085.5 | 2.0 | 1,044 | 26 | 3.6 | 14 |
Georgia | 4,576.1 | 1.7 | 1,090 | 21 | 3.6 | 14 |
Hawaii | 665.1 | -0.8 | 1,053 | 24 | 3.5 | 17 |
Idaho | 756.9 | 3.1 | 918 | 46 | 3.1 | 32 |
Illinois | 6,043.5 | 0.2 | 1,221 | 10 | 2.7 | 38 |
Indiana | 3,106.0 | 0.6 | 969 | 38 | 3.0 | 34 |
Iowa | 1,560.4 | 0.1 | 984 | 37 | 1.9 | 47 |
Kansas | 1,410.7 | 0.6 | 959 | 40 | 3.5 | 17 |
Kentucky | 1,928.3 | 0.8 | 955 | 41 | 3.2 | 27 |
Louisiana | 1,927.7 | -0.5 | 993 | 34 | 2.5 | 42 |
Maine | 620.2 | 0.7 | 955 | 41 | 5.3 | 2 |
Maryland | 2,728.1 | 0.9 | 1,271 | 8 | 3.5 | 17 |
Massachusetts | 3,660.8 | 0.9 | 1,511 | 2 | 3.8 | 11 |
Michigan | 4,385.3 | 0.4 | 1,115 | 18 | 3.4 | 22 |
Minnesota | 2,912.8 | 0.4 | 1,177 | 14 | 3.2 | 27 |
Mississippi | 1,145.0 | 0.0 | 818 | 51 | 3.2 | 27 |
Missouri | 2,846.2 | 0.9 | 1,010 | 32 | 3.0 | 34 |
Montana | 474.1 | 1.1 | 918 | 46 | 3.4 | 22 |
Nebraska | 990.9 | 0.7 | 969 | 38 | 4.2 | 6 |
Nevada | 1,435.5 | 2.7 | 1,030 | 29 | 2.4 | 45 |
New Hampshire | 671.3 | 0.8 | 1,192 | 12 | 2.9 | 37 |
New Jersey | 4,157.4 | 0.8 | 1,332 | 7 | 2.5 | 42 |
New Mexico | 844.0 | 1.5 | 942 | 44 | 4.0 | 8 |
New York | 9,691.0 | 0.8 | 1,499 | 3 | 3.7 | 13 |
North Carolina | 4,546.9 | 1.9 | 1,036 | 28 | 2.4 | 45 |
North Dakota | 424.6 | 0.5 | 1,085 | 22 | 2.6 | 39 |
Ohio | 5,477.2 | 0.5 | 1,037 | 27 | 3.1 | 32 |
Oklahoma | 1,639.4 | 0.3 | 945 | 43 | 1.4 | 49 |
Oregon | 1,969.3 | 1.6 | 1,100 | 19 | 4.6 | 5 |
Pennsylvania | 5,985.9 | 0.8 | 1,143 | 15 | 3.6 | 14 |
Rhode Island | 489.8 | 0.6 | 1,099 | 20 | 1.1 | 50 |
South Carolina | 2,144.8 | 1.2 | 931 | 45 | 4.0 | 8 |
South Dakota | 430.7 | 0.6 | 916 | 48 | 3.5 | 17 |
Tennessee | 3,085.4 | 1.6 | 1,047 | 25 | 1.6 | 48 |
Texas | 12,793.0 | 2.0 | 1,187 | 13 | 3.4 | 22 |
Utah | 1,547.8 | 2.5 | 1,022 | 30 | 5.0 | 3 |
Vermont | 314.0 | -0.4 | 987 | 35 | 3.5 | 17 |
Virginia | 3,978.7 | 1.2 | 1,204 | 11 | 3.4 | 22 |
Washington | 3,457.7 | 2.2 | 1,370 | 6 | 6.4 | 1 |
West Virginia | 690.3 | -2.0 | 904 | 49 | -1.4 | 51 |
Wisconsin | 2,898.0 | 0.2 | 1,022 | 30 | 3.3 | 26 |
Wyoming | 276.3 | 1.4 | 1,007 | 33 | 3.0 | 34 |
Puerto Rico | 910.7 | 1.5 | 575 | (3) | -0.2 | (3) |
Virgin Islands | 39.2 | 10.8 | 1,065 | (3) | 13.5 | (3) |
Footnotes: | ||||||
Note: Data are preliminary. Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs. |
Last Modified Date: Monday, July 13, 2020