Thursday, May 18, 2017
Workers in the Tucson Metropolitan Statistical Area had an average (mean) hourly wage of $21.42 in May 2016, about 10 percent below the nationwide average of $23.86, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Assistant Commissioner for Regional Operations Richard Holden noted that, after testing for statistical significance, wages in the local area were lower than their respective national averages in 14 of the 22 major occupational groups, including management; legal; and arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media. No wages in the local area were higher than their respective national averages.
When compared to the nationwide distribution, local employment was more highly concentrated in 9 of the 22 occupational groups, including personal care and service; office and administrative support; and food preparation and serving related. Conversely, five groups had employment shares significantly below their national representation, including production; transportation and material moving; and business and financial operations. (See table A and box note at end of release.)
|Major occupational group||Percent of total employment||Mean hourly wage|
|United States||Tucson||United States||Tucson||Percent difference (1)|
Total, all occupations
Business and financial operations
Computer and mathematical
Architecture and engineering
Life, physical, and social science
Community and social service
Education, training, and library
Arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media
Healthcare practitioners and technical
Food preparation and serving related
Building and grounds cleaning and maintenance
Personal care and service
Sales and related
Office and administrative support
Farming, fishing, and forestry
Construction and extraction
Installation, maintenance, and repair
Transportation and material moving
One occupational group—personal care and service—was chosen to illustrate the diversity of data available for any of the 22 major occupational categories. Tucson had 17,480 jobs in personal care and service, accounting for 4.9 percent of local area employment, significantly higher than the 3.2-percent share nationally. The average hourly wage for this occupational group locally was $11.50, significantly below the national wage of $12.74.
Some of the larger detailed occupations within the personal care and service group included personal care aides (8,820), first-line supervisors of personal service workers (1,310), and hairdressers, hairstylists, and cosmetologists (1,090). Among the higher paying jobs were morticians, undertakers, and funeral directors and skincare specialists, with mean hourly wages of $20.15 and $18.01, respectively. At the lower end of the wage scale were childcare workers ($9.99) and personal care aides ($10.06). (Detailed occupational data for personal care and service are presented in table 1; for a complete listing of detailed occupations available go to www.bls.gov/oes/2016/may/oes_46060.htm .)
Location quotients allow us to explore the occupational make-up of a metropolitan area by comparing the composition of jobs in an area relative to the national average. (See table 1.) For example, a location quotient of 2.0 indicates that an occupation accounts for twice the share of employment in the area than it does nationally. In the Tucson Metropolitan Statistical Area, above-average concentrations of employment were found in many of the occupations within the personal care and service group. For instance, skincare specialists were employed at 3.0 times the national rate in Tucson, and first-line supervisors of personal service workers, at 2.7 times the U.S. average. On the other hand, amusement and recreation attendants had a location quotient of 1.1 in Tucson, indicating that this particular occupation’s local and national employment shares were similar.
These statistics are from the Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) survey, a federal-state cooperative program between BLS and State Workforce Agencies, in this case, the Arizona Department of Administration.
A value that is statistically different from another does not necessarily mean that the difference has economic or practical significance. Statistical significance is concerned with the ability to make confident statements about a universe based on a sample. It is entirely possible that a large difference between two values is not significantly different statistically, while a small difference is, since both the size and heterogeneity of the sample affect the relative error of the data being tested.
The Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) survey is a semiannual mail survey measuring occupational employment and wage rates for wage and salary workers in nonfarm establishments in the United States. The OES data available from BLS include cross-industry occupational employment and wage estimates for the nation; over 650 areas, including states and the District of Columbia, metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs), metropolitan divisions, nonmetropolitan areas, and territories; national industry-specific estimates at the NAICS sector, 3-, 4-, and selected 5- and 6-digit industry levels, and national estimates by ownership across all industries and for schools and hospitals. OES data are available at www.bls.gov/oes/tables.htm.
OES estimates are constructed from a sample of about 1.2 million establishments. Each year, two semiannual panels of approximately 200,000 sampled establishments are contacted, one panel in May and the other in November. Responses are obtained by mail, Internet or other electronic means, email, telephone, or personal visit. The May 2016 estimates are based on responses from six semiannual panels collected over a 3-year period: May 2016, November 2015, May 2015, November 2014, May 2014, and November 2013. The overall national response rate for the six panels, based on the 50 states and the District of Columbia, is 73 percent based on establishments and 69 percent based on weighted sampled employment. The unweighted employment of sampled establishments across all six semiannual panels represents approximately 58 percent of total national employment. The sample in the Tucson Metropolitan Statistical Area included 2,730 establishments with a response rate of 65 percent. For more information about OES concepts and methodology, go to www.bls.gov/news.release/ocwage.tn.htm.
The May 2016 OES estimates are based on the 2010 Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system and the 2012 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). Information about the 2010 SOC is available on the BLS website at www.bls.gov/soc and information about the 2012 NAICS is available at www.bls.gov/bls/naics.htm.
Metropolitan area definitions
The substate area data published in this release reflect the standards and definitions established by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.
The Tucson, Ariz. Metropolitan Statistical Area includes Pima County.
OES data are available on our regional web page at www.bls.gov/regions/west. Answers to frequently asked questions about the OES data are available at www.bls.gov/oes/oes_ques.htm. Detailed technical information about the OES survey is available in our Survey Methods and Reliability Statement on the BLS website at www.bls.gov/oes/current/methods_statement.pdf.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request . Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.
|Occupation (1)||Employment||Mean wages|
|Level (2)||Location quotient (3)||Hourly||Annual (4)|
Personal care and service occupations
First-line supervisors of personal service workers
Nonfarm animal caretakers
Ushers, lobby attendants, and ticket takers
Amusement and recreation attendants
Locker room, coatroom, and dressing room attendants
Entertainment attendants and related workers, all other
Morticians, undertakers, and funeral directors
Hairdressers, hairstylists, and cosmetologists
Manicurists and pedicurists
Baggage porters and bellhops
Tour guides and escorts
Personal care aides
Fitness trainers and aerobics instructors
Personal care and service workers, all other
Last Modified Date: Thursday, May 18, 2017