Tuesday, April 02, 2019
In 2018, the broadest measure of labor underutilization, designated U-6 (which includes the unemployed, workers employed part time for economic reasons, and those marginally attached to the labor force), was 12.0 percent in Alaska, significantly higher than the 7.7-percent rate for the nation, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Assistant Commissioner for Regional Operations Richard Holden noted that 1 of the 6 alternative measures of labor underutilization in Alaska, the U-5, was statistically lower from the previous year. Nationally, all six measures declined significantly over the year. (See table 1.)
The official concept of unemployment, U-3 in the U-1 to U-6 range of measures, includes all jobless persons who are available to take a job and have actively sought work in the past 4 weeks. In Alaska, 6.6 percent of the labor force was unemployed as measured by U-3 in 2018, significantly higher than the 3.9-percent rate for the nation. (See chart 1.) (The official measure of unemployment in states is derived using a statistical model that incorporates data from the Current Population Survey [CPS] and other sources, and this model-based estimate can differ from the direct CPS estimate discussed here.)
Alaska had 23,400 unemployed residents in 2018 according to the CPS. In addition, there were 13,300 workers who were employed part time for economic reasons (also known as involuntary part time). These individuals were working part time because of slack work or business conditions, or because they were unable to find a full-time job. (See chart 2.) Nationwide, there were 4.8 million individuals working part time for economic reasons in 2018.
As noted, 1 of the 6 measures of labor underutilization in Alaska had a significant over-the-year decrease in 2018. The U-5 measure fell 1.5 percentage points, while the remaining five measures had no significant over-the-year changes.
In 2018, the number of individuals considered to be marginally attached to the labor force in Alaska was 6,800. People marginally attached to the labor force are not working but indicate that they would like to work, are available to work, and have looked for work at some time during the past 12 months even though they had not searched for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. In the United States, the number marginally attached totaled 1.5 million in 2018.
Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, are persons who are not currently looking for work because they believe no jobs are available for them. In 2018, there were 2,000 discouraged workers in Alaska, accounting for about 30 percent of all marginally attached workers in the state. The U-4 measure, which adds discouraged workers to the number of the unemployed (expressed as a percentage of the labor force plus the number of discouraged workers), was 7.1 percent in Alaska, significantly higher than the national rate of 4.1 percent.State comparisons
In 2018, nine states had rates lower than those of the U.S. for all six measures, while three states had rates higher than those of the U.S. for all six measures. (See table 2.)
The U-4 rate includes discouraged workers; thus, the difference between U-3 and U-4 reflects the degree of would-be job-seeker discouragement. At the national level in 2018, the difference between U-3 and U-4 was +0.2 percentage point. No state had a noteworthy difference between these two measures.
The U-5 rate includes all persons who are marginally attached to the labor force, and U-6 adds those who are involuntary part-time workers. Therefore, the larger the difference between U-5 and U-6, the higher the incidence of this form of "underemployment." In 2018, all states and the District of Columbia had differences between their U-5 and U-6 rates. Connecticut had the largest gap, +3.9 percentage points. North Dakota had the smallest gap, +1.5 percentage points, indicating comparatively low degrees of underemployment. At the national level, the difference between U-5 and U-6 was +2.9 percentage points.
Relative to 2017, three states (Florida, Illinois, and Texas) experienced decreases in all six measures of labor underutilization. For each measure, rates declined over the year for at least 11 states (U-1) and as many as 13 states (U-4 and U-5). No state had a significant over-the-year rate increase in any measure.
Some states with extreme measures, either low or high, maintained their general place in the rankings of alternative measures over the year. Hawaii, New Hampshire, and Vermont all had rates among the 10 lowest for each measure in 2017 and 2018. Similarly, three states (Alaska, Louisiana, and West Virginia) and the District of Columbia all had rates among the 10 highest for each measure in both periods.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) produces six measures of labor underutilization based on Current Population Survey (CPS) data. Monthly, the BLS publishes these six measures for the United States in the Employment Situation news release. (See www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm.) State estimates, presented as 4-quarter averages, are provided each quarter on the BLS website. (For the most recent data see www.bls.gov/lau/stalt.htm.)
The official concept of unemployment (as measured in the CPS) is equivalent to the U-3 in the U-1 to U-6 range of measures. The other measures are provided to data users and analysts who want more narrowly (U-1 and U-2) or broadly (U-4 through U-6) defined measures.
Data are calculated from quarterly tables in which the components of each measure are rounded to the nearest hundred. As a result, these measures contain slightly more rounding error than that found in typical CPS annual average tabulations (in which rates are calculated based on unrounded data). Due to small state sample sizes, neither monthly nor quarterly state data from the CPS satisfy BLS publication standards.
The unemployment rates (U-3) in this release are derived directly from the CPS, because this is the only source of data for the various components of the alternative measures. As a result, these U-3 measures may differ from the official state annual average unemployment rates. The latter are estimates developed from statistical models that greatly improve the reliability of the top-side labor force and unemployment estimates. Those models, developed by the Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) program, incorporate CPS estimates, as well as input data from other sources. The model-based estimates are accessible through the LAUS home page at www.bls.gov/lau/home.htm.
Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339.
|2017||2018||Change 2017–18||2017||2018||Change 2017–18|
U-1 Persons unemployed 15 weeks or longer, as a percent of the civilian labor force
U-2 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs, as a percent of the civilian labor force
U-3 Total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (official concept of unemployment) (1)
U-4 Total unemployed plus discouraged workers, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus discouraged workers (2)
U-5 Total unemployed, plus discouraged workers, plus all other persons marginally attached to the labor force, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force (2)
U-6 Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force (2)
Note: An asterisk indicates that the over-the-year change is statistically different at the 90-percent confidence level.
District of Columbia
Note: See table 1 for definitions of measures and related footnote information.
Last Modified Date: Tuesday, April 02, 2019