Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
SHARE ON:
Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2020
23-1021 Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
Conduct hearings to recommend or make decisions on claims concerning government programs or other government-related matters. Determine liability, sanctions, or penalties, or recommend the acceptance or rejection of claims or settlements. Excludes "Arbitrators, Mediators, and Conciliators" (23-1022).
National estimates for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
Industry profile for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
Geographic profile for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers
National estimates for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
Employment estimate and mean wage estimates for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
| Employment (1) |
Employment
RSE (3) |
Mean hourly
wage |
Mean annual
wage (2) |
Wage RSE (3) |
| 14,570 |
0.4 % |
$ 49.06 |
$ 102,050 |
0.8 % |
Percentile wage estimates for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
| Percentile |
10% |
25% |
50%
(Median) |
75% |
90% |
| Hourly Wage |
$ 22.88 |
$ 31.38 |
$ 46.89 |
$ 63.36 |
$ 86.97 |
| Annual Wage (2) |
$ 47,580 |
$ 65,260 |
$ 97,520 |
$ 131,790 |
$ 180,910 |
Industry profile for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
Industries with the highest published employment and wages for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers are provided.
For a list of all industries with employment in Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers, see the Create Customized Tables function.
Industries with the highest levels of employment in Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
Industries with the highest concentration of employment in Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
Top paying industries for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
Geographic profile for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
States and areas with the highest published employment, location quotients, and wages for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers are provided.
For a list of all areas with employment in Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers, see the Create Customized Tables function.
States with the highest employment level in Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
| State |
Employment (1) |
Employment per thousand jobs |
Location quotient (9) |
Hourly mean wage |
Annual mean wage (2) |
| California |
1,830 |
0.11 |
1.07 |
$ 60.10 |
$ 125,010 |
| New York |
1,540 |
0.18 |
1.69 |
$ 51.68 |
$ 107,490 |
| Texas |
1,130 |
0.09 |
0.89 |
$ 42.45 |
$ 88,310 |
| Pennsylvania |
740 |
0.13 |
1.28 |
$ 45.24 |
$ 94,090 |
| Ohio |
710 |
0.14 |
1.33 |
$ 42.40 |
$ 88,200 |
States with the highest concentration of jobs and location quotients in Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
| State |
Employment (1) |
Employment per thousand jobs |
Location quotient (9) |
Hourly mean wage |
Annual mean wage (2) |
| Oregon |
420 |
0.23 |
2.20 |
$ 43.31 |
$ 90,080 |
| New Hampshire |
130 |
0.20 |
1.93 |
$ 38.28 |
$ 79,630 |
| New Mexico |
150 |
0.19 |
1.83 |
$ 42.41 |
$ 88,220 |
| Arkansas |
230 |
0.19 |
1.82 |
$ 36.70 |
$ 76,340 |
| West Virginia |
120 |
0.19 |
1.81 |
$ 36.27 |
$ 75,450 |
Top paying states for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
Metropolitan areas with the highest employment level in Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
| Metropolitan area |
Employment (1) |
Employment per thousand jobs |
Location quotient (9) |
Hourly mean wage |
Annual mean wage (2) |
| New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA |
1,360 |
0.15 |
1.47 |
$ 52.65 |
$ 109,510 |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA |
800 |
0.14 |
1.31 |
$ 53.89 |
$ 112,090 |
| Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV |
640 |
0.21 |
2.02 |
$ 61.43 |
$ 127,780 |
| Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA |
390 |
0.15 |
1.40 |
$ 39.69 |
$ 82,550 |
| Columbus, OH |
380 |
0.37 |
3.54 |
$ 33.12 |
$ 68,890 |
| Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI |
380 |
0.09 |
0.83 |
$ 51.34 |
$ 106,790 |
| Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX |
370 |
0.12 |
1.19 |
$ 49.45 |
$ 102,860 |
| Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD |
370 |
0.14 |
1.29 |
$ 45.68 |
$ 95,010 |
| San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA |
360 |
0.15 |
1.45 |
$ 63.07 |
$ 131,190 |
| Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade, CA |
270 |
0.28 |
2.67 |
$ 69.88 |
$ 145,340 |
Metropolitan areas with the highest concentration of jobs and location quotients in Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
| Metropolitan area |
Employment (1) |
Employment per thousand jobs |
Location quotient (9) |
Hourly mean wage |
Annual mean wage (2) |
| Salem, OR |
190 |
1.15 |
10.98 |
$ 39.57 |
$ 82,310 |
| Lansing-East Lansing, MI |
130 |
0.66 |
6.29 |
$ 55.75 |
$ 115,960 |
| Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR |
200 |
0.61 |
5.79 |
$ 35.97 |
$ 74,810 |
| Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA |
130 |
0.42 |
3.97 |
$ 45.17 |
$ 93,950 |
| Columbus, OH |
380 |
0.37 |
3.54 |
$ 33.12 |
$ 68,890 |
| Montgomery, AL |
50 |
0.34 |
3.24 |
$ 48.91 |
$ 101,740 |
| Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade, CA |
270 |
0.28 |
2.67 |
$ 69.88 |
$ 145,340 |
| Richmond, VA |
150 |
0.24 |
2.32 |
$ 40.70 |
$ 84,650 |
| Savannah, GA |
40 |
0.23 |
2.17 |
$ 38.11 |
$ 79,260 |
| Columbia, SC |
80 |
0.22 |
2.06 |
$ 41.87 |
$ 87,100 |
Top paying metropolitan areas for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
| Metropolitan area |
Employment (1) |
Employment per thousand jobs |
Location quotient (9) |
Hourly mean wage |
Annual mean wage (2) |
| Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade, CA |
270 |
0.28 |
2.67 |
$ 69.88 |
$ 145,340 |
| Kansas City, MO-KS |
60 |
0.06 |
0.54 |
$ 67.28 |
$ 139,930 |
| Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA |
70 |
0.05 |
0.46 |
$ 66.90 |
$ 139,150 |
| San Diego-Carlsbad, CA |
120 |
0.08 |
0.79 |
$ 65.84 |
$ 136,940 |
| Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN |
40 |
0.04 |
0.36 |
$ 65.75 |
$ 136,760 |
| San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA |
30 |
0.03 |
0.28 |
$ 64.47 |
$ 134,110 |
| San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA |
360 |
0.15 |
1.45 |
$ 63.07 |
$ 131,190 |
| Boston-Cambridge-Nashua, MA-NH |
140 |
0.06 |
0.53 |
$ 61.94 |
$ 128,830 |
| Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV |
640 |
0.21 |
2.02 |
$ 61.43 |
$ 127,780 |
| Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI |
140 |
0.08 |
0.74 |
$ 60.87 |
$ 126,610 |
Nonmetropolitan areas with the highest employment in Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
Nonmetropolitan areas with the highest concentration of jobs and location quotients in Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
Top paying nonmetropolitan areas for Administrative Law Judges, Adjudicators, and Hearing Officers:
About May 2020 National, State, Metropolitan, and Nonmetropolitan Area Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
These estimates are calculated with data collected from employers in all industry sectors, all metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, and all states and the District of Columbia.
The top employment and wage figures are provided above. The complete list is available in the downloadable XLS files.
The percentile wage estimate is the value of a wage below which a certain percent of workers fall.
The median wage is the 50th percentile wage estimate—50 percent of workers earn less than the median and 50 percent of workers earn more than the median.
More about percentile wages.
(1) Estimates for detailed occupations do not sum to the totals because the totals include occupations not shown separately. Estimates do not include self-employed workers.
(2) Annual wages have been calculated by multiplying the hourly mean wage by a "year-round, full-time" hours figure of 2,080 hours;
for those occupations where there is not an hourly wage published, the annual wage has been directly calculated from the reported survey data.
(3) The relative standard error (RSE) is a measure of the reliability of a survey statistic. The smaller the relative standard error, the more precise the estimate.
(8) Estimate not released.
(9) The location quotient is the ratio of the area concentration of occupational employment to the national average concentration.
A location quotient greater than one indicates the occupation has a higher share of employment than average, and a location quotient less than one indicates the occupation is less prevalent in the area than average.
Other OEWS estimates and related information:
May 2020 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
May 2020 State Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
May 2020 Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Area Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
May 2020 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
May 2020 Occupation Profiles
Technical Notes
Last Modified Date: March 31, 2021
United States Department of Labor
