Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics
SHARE ON:
Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2020
51-9193 Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders
Operate or tend equipment such as cooling and freezing units, refrigerators, batch freezers, and freezing tunnels, to cool or freeze products, food, blood plasma, and chemicals.
National estimates for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders
Industry profile for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders
Geographic profile for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders
National estimates for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
Employment estimate and mean wage estimates for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
| Employment (1) |
Employment
RSE (3) |
Mean hourly
wage |
Mean annual
wage (2) |
Wage RSE (3) |
| 8,020 |
4.5 % |
$ 19.05 |
$ 39,610 |
1.1 % |
Percentile wage estimates for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
| Percentile |
10% |
25% |
50%
(Median) |
75% |
90% |
| Hourly Wage |
$ 12.59 |
$ 14.39 |
$ 18.10 |
$ 23.19 |
$ 28.02 |
| Annual Wage (2) |
$ 26,190 |
$ 29,920 |
$ 37,650 |
$ 48,230 |
$ 58,290 |
Industry profile for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
Industries with the highest published employment and wages for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders are provided.
For a list of all industries with employment in Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders, see the Create Customized Tables function.
Industries with the highest levels of employment in Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
Industries with the highest concentration of employment in Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
Top paying industries for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
Geographic profile for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
States and areas with the highest published employment, location quotients, and wages for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders are provided.
For a list of all areas with employment in Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders, see the Create Customized Tables function.
States with the highest employment level in Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
| State |
Employment (1) |
Employment per thousand jobs |
Location quotient (9) |
Hourly mean wage |
Annual mean wage (2) |
| California |
1,130 |
0.07 |
1.19 |
$ 17.88 |
$ 37,200 |
| Iowa |
570 |
0.39 |
6.71 |
$ 20.80 |
$ 43,270 |
| Texas |
530 |
0.04 |
0.76 |
$ 19.41 |
$ 40,380 |
| Missouri |
520 |
0.19 |
3.33 |
$ 19.32 |
$ 40,180 |
| Georgia |
410 |
0.10 |
1.66 |
$ 17.00 |
$ 35,360 |
States with the highest concentration of jobs and location quotients in Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
| State |
Employment (1) |
Employment per thousand jobs |
Location quotient (9) |
Hourly mean wage |
Annual mean wage (2) |
| Iowa |
570 |
0.39 |
6.71 |
$ 20.80 |
$ 43,270 |
| Arkansas |
340 |
0.29 |
5.06 |
$ 18.16 |
$ 37,770 |
| Missouri |
520 |
0.19 |
3.33 |
$ 19.32 |
$ 40,180 |
| Mississippi |
180 |
0.17 |
2.98 |
$ 17.10 |
$ 35,580 |
| Nebraska |
150 |
0.16 |
2.85 |
$ 19.17 |
$ 39,870 |
Top paying states for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
| State |
Employment (1) |
Employment per thousand jobs |
Location quotient (9) |
Hourly mean wage |
Annual mean wage (2) |
| New Jersey |
170 |
0.05 |
0.79 |
$ 26.73 |
$ 55,600 |
| Kansas |
190 |
0.14 |
2.48 |
$ 22.52 |
$ 46,840 |
| Minnesota |
400 |
0.15 |
2.59 |
$ 21.87 |
$ 45,490 |
| Michigan |
80 |
0.02 |
0.36 |
$ 21.39 |
$ 44,490 |
| Arizona |
50 |
0.02 |
0.33 |
$ 21.29 |
$ 44,280 |
Metropolitan areas with the highest employment level in Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
| Metropolitan area |
Employment (1) |
Employment per thousand jobs |
Location quotient (9) |
Hourly mean wage |
Annual mean wage (2) |
| St. Louis, MO-IL |
250 |
0.19 |
3.37 |
$ 18.08 |
$ 37,610 |
| Rochester, MN |
180 |
1.56 |
27.12 |
$ 24.15 |
$ 50,230 |
| New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA |
160 |
0.02 |
0.31 |
$ 26.47 |
$ 55,070 |
| Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI |
140 |
0.03 |
0.55 |
(8) |
(8) |
| Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA |
140 |
0.05 |
0.91 |
$ 16.12 |
$ 33,520 |
| Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX |
140 |
0.04 |
0.66 |
$ 22.99 |
$ 47,820 |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA |
130 |
0.02 |
0.39 |
$ 17.53 |
$ 36,470 |
| Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO |
100 |
0.40 |
6.98 |
$ 16.94 |
$ 35,230 |
| Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD |
70 |
0.03 |
0.48 |
(8) |
(8) |
| Visalia-Porterville, CA |
60 |
0.43 |
7.46 |
$ 19.83 |
$ 41,240 |
Metropolitan areas with the highest concentration of jobs and location quotients in Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
| Metropolitan area |
Employment (1) |
Employment per thousand jobs |
Location quotient (9) |
Hourly mean wage |
Annual mean wage (2) |
| Rochester, MN |
180 |
1.56 |
27.12 |
$ 24.15 |
$ 50,230 |
| Gainesville, GA |
60 |
0.63 |
10.89 |
$ 18.58 |
$ 38,640 |
| St. Cloud, MN |
60 |
0.55 |
9.62 |
$ 17.71 |
$ 36,830 |
| Visalia-Porterville, CA |
60 |
0.43 |
7.46 |
$ 19.83 |
$ 41,240 |
| Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO |
100 |
0.40 |
6.98 |
$ 16.94 |
$ 35,230 |
| Chattanooga, TN-GA |
50 |
0.20 |
3.54 |
$ 15.34 |
$ 31,910 |
| St. Louis, MO-IL |
250 |
0.19 |
3.37 |
$ 18.08 |
$ 37,610 |
| Lancaster, PA |
40 |
0.18 |
3.17 |
(8) |
(8) |
| Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA |
60 |
0.12 |
2.09 |
$ 18.40 |
$ 38,260 |
| Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA |
140 |
0.05 |
0.91 |
$ 16.12 |
$ 33,520 |
Top paying metropolitan areas for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
| Metropolitan area |
Employment (1) |
Employment per thousand jobs |
Location quotient (9) |
Hourly mean wage |
Annual mean wage (2) |
| Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX |
30 |
0.01 |
0.18 |
$ 27.40 |
$ 56,990 |
| New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA |
160 |
0.02 |
0.31 |
$ 26.47 |
$ 55,070 |
| Kansas City, MO-KS |
40 |
0.04 |
0.71 |
$ 24.85 |
$ 51,700 |
| Rochester, MN |
180 |
1.56 |
27.12 |
$ 24.15 |
$ 50,230 |
| Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX |
140 |
0.04 |
0.66 |
$ 22.99 |
$ 47,820 |
| Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA |
40 |
0.02 |
0.34 |
$ 22.45 |
$ 46,690 |
| Salinas, CA |
(8) |
(8) |
(8) |
$ 21.50 |
$ 44,720 |
| San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA |
30 |
0.01 |
0.24 |
$ 21.13 |
$ 43,950 |
| Oklahoma City, OK |
(8) |
(8) |
(8) |
$ 19.99 |
$ 41,580 |
| Visalia-Porterville, CA |
60 |
0.43 |
7.46 |
$ 19.83 |
$ 41,240 |
Nonmetropolitan areas with the highest employment in Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
Nonmetropolitan areas with the highest concentration of jobs and location quotients in Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
Top paying nonmetropolitan areas for Cooling and Freezing Equipment Operators and Tenders:
About May 2020 National, State, Metropolitan, and Nonmetropolitan Area Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
These estimates are calculated with data collected from employers in all industry sectors, all metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, and all states and the District of Columbia.
The top employment and wage figures are provided above. The complete list is available in the downloadable XLS files.
The percentile wage estimate is the value of a wage below which a certain percent of workers fall.
The median wage is the 50th percentile wage estimate—50 percent of workers earn less than the median and 50 percent of workers earn more than the median.
More about percentile wages.
(1) Estimates for detailed occupations do not sum to the totals because the totals include occupations not shown separately. Estimates do not include self-employed workers.
(2) Annual wages have been calculated by multiplying the hourly mean wage by a "year-round, full-time" hours figure of 2,080 hours;
for those occupations where there is not an hourly wage published, the annual wage has been directly calculated from the reported survey data.
(3) The relative standard error (RSE) is a measure of the reliability of a survey statistic. The smaller the relative standard error, the more precise the estimate.
(7) The value is less than .005 percent of industry employment.
(8) Estimate not released.
(9) The location quotient is the ratio of the area concentration of occupational employment to the national average concentration.
A location quotient greater than one indicates the occupation has a higher share of employment than average, and a location quotient less than one indicates the occupation is less prevalent in the area than average.
Other OEWS estimates and related information:
May 2020 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
May 2020 State Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
May 2020 Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Area Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
May 2020 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
May 2020 Occupation Profiles
Technical Notes
Last Modified Date: March 31, 2021
United States Department of Labor
