An official website of the United States government
Provide technical assistance regarding the conservation of soil, water, forests, or related natural resources. May compile data pertaining to size, content, condition, and other characteristics of forest tracts under the direction of foresters, or train and lead forest workers in forest propagation and fire prevention and suppression. May assist conservation scientists in managing, improving, and protecting rangelands and wildlife habitats. Excludes “Conservation Scientists” (19-1031) and “Foresters” (19-1032).
Employment estimate and mean wage estimates for Forest and Conservation Technicians:
Employment (1) | Employment RSE (3) |
Mean hourly wage |
Mean annual wage (2) |
Wage RSE (3) |
---|---|---|---|---|
29,120 | 1.1 % | $ 21.64 | $ 45,000 | 0.3 % |
Percentile wage estimates for Forest and Conservation Technicians:
Percentile | 10% | 25% | 50% (Median) |
75% | 90% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hourly Wage | $ 15.65 | $ 17.00 | $ 19.96 | $ 25.40 | $ 30.00 |
Annual Wage (2) | $ 32,550 | $ 35,360 | $ 41,520 | $ 52,830 | $ 62,400 |
Industries with the highest published employment and wages for Forest and Conservation Technicians are provided. For a list of all industries with employment in Forest and Conservation Technicians, see the Create Customized Tables function.
Industries with the highest levels of employment in Forest and Conservation Technicians:
Industry | Employment (1) | Percent of industry employment | Hourly mean wage | Annual mean wage (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Federal Executive Branch (OEWS Designation) | 19,070 | 0.91 | $ 21.50 | $ 44,720 |
State Government, excluding schools and hospitals (OEWS Designation) | 4,580 | 0.22 | $ 21.15 | $ 44,000 |
Local Government, excluding schools and hospitals (OEWS Designation) | 2,510 | 0.05 | $ 23.41 | $ 48,700 |
Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services | 900 | 0.05 | $ 19.65 | $ 40,860 |
Social Advocacy Organizations | 520 | 0.22 | $ 20.95 | $ 43,580 |
Industries with the highest concentration of employment in Forest and Conservation Technicians:
Industry | Employment (1) | Percent of industry employment | Hourly mean wage | Annual mean wage (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Federal Executive Branch (OEWS Designation) | 19,070 | 0.91 | $ 21.50 | $ 44,720 |
Social Advocacy Organizations | 520 | 0.22 | $ 20.95 | $ 43,580 |
State Government, excluding schools and hospitals (OEWS Designation) | 4,580 | 0.22 | $ 21.15 | $ 44,000 |
Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions | 90 | 0.06 | $ 17.17 | $ 35,710 |
Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services | 900 | 0.05 | $ 19.65 | $ 40,860 |
Top paying industries for Forest and Conservation Technicians:
Industry | Employment (1) | Percent of industry employment | Hourly mean wage | Annual mean wage (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution | 90 | 0.02 | $ 38.13 | $ 79,320 |
Business, Professional, Labor, Political, and Similar Organizations | (8) | (8) | $ 26.97 | $ 56,100 |
Employment Services | (8) | (8) | $ 24.55 | $ 51,070 |
Local Government, excluding schools and hospitals (OEWS Designation) | 2,510 | 0.05 | $ 23.41 | $ 48,700 |
Scientific Research and Development Services | 170 | 0.02 | $ 22.95 | $ 47,730 |
States and areas with the highest published employment, location quotients, and wages for Forest and Conservation Technicians are provided. For a list of all areas with employment in Forest and Conservation Technicians, see the Create Customized Tables function.
States with the highest employment level in Forest and Conservation Technicians:
State | Employment (1) | Employment per thousand jobs | Location quotient (9) | Hourly mean wage | Annual mean wage (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | 5,800 | 0.33 | 1.67 | $ 22.42 | $ 46,630 |
Oregon | 2,550 | 1.35 | 6.84 | $ 21.90 | $ 45,560 |
Montana | 1,800 | 3.68 | 18.71 | $ 20.16 | $ 41,930 |
Arizona | 1,250 | 0.41 | 2.10 | $ 20.56 | $ 42,770 |
Colorado | 1,200 | 0.44 | 2.21 | $ 21.93 | $ 45,620 |
States with the highest concentration of jobs and location quotients in Forest and Conservation Technicians:
State | Employment (1) | Employment per thousand jobs | Location quotient (9) | Hourly mean wage | Annual mean wage (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Montana | 1,800 | 3.68 | 18.71 | $ 20.16 | $ 41,930 |
Wyoming | 570 | 2.12 | 10.79 | $ 20.27 | $ 42,160 |
Alaska | 440 | 1.44 | 7.34 | $ 24.50 | $ 50,960 |
Oregon | 2,550 | 1.35 | 6.84 | $ 21.90 | $ 45,560 |
New Mexico | 860 | 1.05 | 5.34 | $ 20.40 | $ 42,440 |
Top paying states for Forest and Conservation Technicians:
State | Employment (1) | Employment per thousand jobs | Location quotient (9) | Hourly mean wage | Annual mean wage (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
New York | 130 | 0.01 | 0.08 | $ 27.13 | $ 56,420 |
Connecticut | 30 | 0.02 | 0.10 | $ 26.87 | $ 55,890 |
Illinois | 450 | 0.08 | 0.39 | $ 26.60 | $ 55,330 |
Maryland | 80 | 0.03 | 0.16 | $ 26.18 | $ 54,450 |
Pennsylvania | 360 | 0.06 | 0.32 | $ 25.91 | $ 53,890 |
Metropolitan areas with the highest employment level in Forest and Conservation Technicians:
Metropolitan area | Employment (1) | Employment per thousand jobs | Location quotient (9) | Hourly mean wage | Annual mean wage (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA | 570 | 0.09 | 0.48 | $ 23.36 | $ 48,590 |
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA | 540 | 0.33 | 1.67 | $ 24.19 | $ 50,310 |
Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade, CA | 530 | 0.52 | 2.63 | $ 22.83 | $ 47,480 |
Flagstaff, AZ | 370 | 5.95 | 30.20 | $ 20.04 | $ 41,670 |
Boise City, ID | 340 | 0.95 | 4.81 | $ 21.54 | $ 44,810 |
Missoula, MT | 310 | 5.03 | 25.56 | $ 20.76 | $ 43,190 |
San Diego-Carlsbad, CA | 310 | 0.21 | 1.05 | $ 23.24 | $ 48,330 |
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA | 270 | 0.23 | 1.16 | $ 25.19 | $ 52,390 |
Bend-Redmond, OR | 260 | 2.94 | 14.91 | $ 22.06 | $ 45,880 |
Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI | 220 | 0.27 | 1.39 | $ 24.58 | $ 51,120 |
Metropolitan areas with the highest concentration of jobs and location quotients in Forest and Conservation Technicians:
Metropolitan area | Employment (1) | Employment per thousand jobs | Location quotient (9) | Hourly mean wage | Annual mean wage (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flagstaff, AZ | 370 | 5.95 | 30.20 | $ 20.04 | $ 41,670 |
Missoula, MT | 310 | 5.03 | 25.56 | $ 20.76 | $ 43,190 |
Carson City, NV | 130 | 4.37 | 22.22 | $ 22.99 | $ 47,810 |
Bend-Redmond, OR | 260 | 2.94 | 14.91 | $ 22.06 | $ 45,880 |
Grants Pass, OR | 70 | 2.54 | 12.93 | $ 21.62 | $ 44,970 |
Corvallis, OR | 80 | 2.18 | 11.06 | $ 29.98 | $ 62,360 |
Rapid City, SD | 120 | 1.70 | 8.65 | $ 21.39 | $ 44,490 |
Chico, CA | 120 | 1.58 | 8.04 | $ 22.93 | $ 47,690 |
Medford, OR | 130 | 1.46 | 7.43 | $ 21.88 | $ 45,520 |
Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA | 70 | 1.43 | 7.28 | $ 21.32 | $ 44,340 |
Top paying metropolitan areas for Forest and Conservation Technicians:
Metropolitan area | Employment (1) | Employment per thousand jobs | Location quotient (9) | Hourly mean wage | Annual mean wage (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corvallis, OR | 80 | 2.18 | 11.06 | $ 29.98 | $ 62,360 |
Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA | 40 | 0.11 | 0.57 | $ 29.41 | $ 61,160 |
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD | 40 | 0.03 | 0.14 | $ 27.04 | $ 56,230 |
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI | 200 | 0.05 | 0.23 | $ 26.98 | $ 56,110 |
Sioux Falls, SD | 30 | 0.20 | 1.01 | $ 26.89 | $ 55,930 |
Boston-Cambridge-Nashua, MA-NH | (8) | (8) | (8) | $ 25.27 | $ 52,560 |
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA | 270 | 0.23 | 1.16 | $ 25.19 | $ 52,390 |
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI | 150 | 0.08 | 0.41 | $ 25.11 | $ 52,230 |
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO | 150 | 0.10 | 0.48 | $ 25.09 | $ 52,180 |
Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA | 40 | 0.12 | 0.59 | $ 25.08 | $ 52,170 |
Nonmetropolitan areas with the highest employment in Forest and Conservation Technicians:
Nonmetropolitan area | Employment (1) | Employment per thousand jobs | Location quotient (9) | Hourly mean wage | Annual mean wage (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Valley-Northern Mountains Region of California nonmetropolitan area | 1,150 | 11.36 | 57.70 | $ 21.48 | $ 44,680 |
Northwestern Idaho nonmetropolitan area | 770 | 10.62 | 53.93 | $ 20.56 | $ 42,760 |
West Montana nonmetropolitan area | 700 | 8.76 | 44.48 | $ 19.82 | $ 41,220 |
Eastern Oregon nonmetropolitan area | 660 | 9.32 | 47.34 | $ 20.84 | $ 43,360 |
Central Oregon nonmetropolitan area | 520 | 8.29 | 42.11 | $ 20.79 | $ 43,240 |
Nonmetropolitan areas with the highest concentration of jobs and location quotients in Forest and Conservation Technicians:
Nonmetropolitan area | Employment (1) | Employment per thousand jobs | Location quotient (9) | Hourly mean wage | Annual mean wage (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Valley-Northern Mountains Region of California nonmetropolitan area | 1,150 | 11.36 | 57.70 | $ 21.48 | $ 44,680 |
Northwestern Idaho nonmetropolitan area | 770 | 10.62 | 53.93 | $ 20.56 | $ 42,760 |
Eastern Oregon nonmetropolitan area | 660 | 9.32 | 47.34 | $ 20.84 | $ 43,360 |
West Montana nonmetropolitan area | 700 | 8.76 | 44.48 | $ 19.82 | $ 41,220 |
Central Oregon nonmetropolitan area | 520 | 8.29 | 42.11 | $ 20.79 | $ 43,240 |
Top paying nonmetropolitan areas for Forest and Conservation Technicians:
Nonmetropolitan area | Employment (1) | Employment per thousand jobs | Location quotient (9) | Hourly mean wage | Annual mean wage (2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Southern Pennsylvania nonmetropolitan area | 40 | 0.24 | 1.21 | $ 26.10 | $ 54,280 |
Northern Pennsylvania nonmetropolitan area | (8) | (8) | (8) | $ 26.05 | $ 54,190 |
Northwest Illinois nonmetropolitan area | 40 | 0.29 | 1.46 | $ 25.91 | $ 53,880 |
West Central Illinois nonmetropolitan area | 40 | 0.22 | 1.14 | $ 25.86 | $ 53,800 |
North Georgia nonmetropolitan area | 30 | 0.19 | 0.95 | $ 25.15 | $ 52,310 |
These estimates are calculated with data collected from employers in all industry sectors, all metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, and all states and the District of Columbia. The top employment and wage figures are provided above. The complete list is available in the downloadable XLS files.
The percentile wage estimate is the value of a wage below which a certain percent of workers fall. The median wage is the 50th percentile wage estimate—50 percent of workers earn less than the median and 50 percent of workers earn more than the median. More about percentile wages.
(1) Estimates for detailed occupations do not sum to the totals because the totals include occupations not shown separately. Estimates do not include self-employed workers.
(2) Annual wages have been calculated by multiplying the hourly mean wage by a "year-round, full-time" hours figure of 2,080 hours; for those occupations where there is not an hourly wage published, the annual wage has been directly calculated from the reported survey data.
(3) The relative standard error (RSE) is a measure of the reliability of a survey statistic. The smaller the relative standard error, the more precise the estimate.
(8) Estimate not released.
(9) The location quotient is the ratio of the area concentration of occupational employment to the national average concentration. A location quotient greater than one indicates the occupation has a higher share of employment than average, and a location quotient less than one indicates the occupation is less prevalent in the area than average.
Other OEWS estimates and related information:
May 2022 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
May 2022 State Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
May 2022 Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Area Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
May 2022 National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates
Last Modified Date: April 25, 2023