Extended mass layoffs in second quarter
August 15, 2002
In the second quarter of 2002, 1,754 extended mass layoff actions were taken by employers that resulted in the separation of 392,338 workers from their jobs.
For the second consecutive quarter, both the total number of layoff events and the number of separations were lower than in the same quarter a year earlier. The decline was most notable in manufacturing industries.
Manufacturing industries accounted for 28 percent of private-sector layoff events and 24 percent of all separations during April-June 2002. A year earlier, manufacturing accounted for 41 percent of private-sector events and 35 percent of separations.
These data are a product of the Mass Layoff Statistics program. "Extended mass layoffs" last more than 30 days and involve 50 or more individuals from a single establishment filing initial claims for unemployment insurance during a consecutive 5-week period. Data for the second quarter of 2002 are preliminary and subject to revision. Additional information is available in "Extended Mass Layoffs in the Second Quarter of 2002" (PDF) (TXT), news release USDL 02-479.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, The Economics Daily, Extended mass layoffs in second quarter on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2002/aug/wk2/art04.htm (visited July 20, 2019).
Recent editions of Spotlight on Statistics
- 25 years of Worker Injury, Illness, and Fatality Case Data
Examines detailed historical data on work-related injuries, illnesses, and fatal injuries.
- Occupational employment projections through the perspective of education and training
Examines employment, projected employment growth, and wages for occupations with different education and training requirements.
- Workers in Alternative Employment Arrangements
A look at independent contractors, on-call workers, temporary help agency workers, and workers provided by contract firms.
- Labor force characteristics of people with a disability
Examines the labor force characteristics of people with a disability and compares them with the characteristics of people with no disability.