Over-the-year changes in State unemployment rates, December 2004
January 26, 2005
December 2004 unemployment rates were lower than a year earlier in 43 states, higher in 5 states and the District of Columbia, and unchanged in 2 states.
Kentucky and Washington reported the largest rate decreases from a year ago (-1.5 percentage points each), followed by Hawaii, New Jersey, and Oklahoma (-1.4 points each).
Nine additional states registered rate decreases of at least 1.0 percentage point. Twenty-three other states had decreases ranging from 0.5 to 0.9 percentage point, inclusive.
Mississippi reported the largest over-the-year unemployment rate increase (+0.8 percentage point). No other state had a rate increase greater than 0.4 percentage point. The District of Columbia posted an unemployment rate increase of 2.0 percentage points from December 2003 to December 2004.
These data come from the BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics program. Data for December 2004 are preliminary and subject to revision. To learn more, see "Regional and State Employment and Unemployment: December 2004" (PDF) (TXT), news release USDL 05-109.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, The Economics Daily, Over-the-year changes in State unemployment rates, December 2004 on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2005/jan/wk4/art03.htm (visited July 22, 2019).
Recent editions of Spotlight on Statistics
- 25 years of Worker Injury, Illness, and Fatality Case Data
Examines detailed historical data on work-related injuries, illnesses, and fatal injuries.
- Occupational employment projections through the perspective of education and training
Examines employment, projected employment growth, and wages for occupations with different education and training requirements.
- Workers in Alternative Employment Arrangements
A look at independent contractors, on-call workers, temporary help agency workers, and workers provided by contract firms.
- Labor force characteristics of people with a disability
Examines the labor force characteristics of people with a disability and compares them with the characteristics of people with no disability.