Working poor and education in 2006
September 04, 2008
Achieving higher levels of education dramatically reduces the likelihood of being among the working poor. Individuals who complete more years of education have greater access to higher paying jobs, such as managerial, professional, and related occupations, than those with lower education.
In 2006, the working-poor rate for college graduates was 1.4 percent, the lowest by education level.
By comparison, individuals with less than a high school diploma and those with a high school diploma or the equivalent, but no college, had working-poor rates of 13.8 percent and 6.3 percent, respectively.
These data were collected in the 2007 Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey. For more information, see "A Profile of the Working Poor, 2006," Report 1006 (PDF 69K). As defined in this report, the working poor are individuals who spent at least 27 weeks in the labor force (working or looking for work), but whose incomes fell below the official poverty level. The working-poor rate is defined as the ratio of the working poor to all individuals in the labor force at least 27 weeks.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, The Economics Daily, Working poor and education in 2006 on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2008/sept/wk1/art03.htm (visited August 25, 2019).
Recent editions of Spotlight on Statistics
- 25 years of Worker Injury, Illness, and Fatality Case Data
Examines detailed historical data on work-related injuries, illnesses, and fatal injuries.
- Occupational employment projections through the perspective of education and training
Examines employment, projected employment growth, and wages for occupations with different education and training requirements.
- Workers in Alternative Employment Arrangements
A look at independent contractors, on-call workers, temporary help agency workers, and workers provided by contract firms.
- Labor force characteristics of people with a disability
Examines the labor force characteristics of people with a disability and compares them with the characteristics of people with no disability.