Department of Labor Logo United States Department of Labor
Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Utah has largest over-the-year percentage increase in employment among states, July 2013

August 21, 2013

From July 2012 to July 2013, nonfarm employment increased in 49 states and the District of Columbia and decreased in 1 state. The largest over-the-year percentage increase occurred in Utah (+3.2 percent), followed by Arizona (+3.1 percent) and Georgia (+2.8 percent). The only over-the-year percentage decrease in employment occurred in Alaska (−0.5 percent).

Percentage change in nonfarm employment by state, seasonally adjusted, July 2012-July 2013Washington, 2.3%Oregon, 1.7%California, 1.6%Idaho, 2.7%Nevada, 1.3%Montana, 1.9%Wyoming, 0.9%Utah, 3.2%Arizona, 3.1%Colorado, 2.7%New Mexico, 1.0%North Dakota, 2.7%South Dakota, 1.1%Nebraska, 0.7%Kansas, 1.2%Oklahoma, 0.6%Texas, 2.7%Louisiana, 1.2%Arkansas, 1.2%Missouri, 1.8%Iowa, 1.7%Minnesota, 2.0%Alaska, -0.5%Hawaii, 1.0%Kentucky, 1.0%Tennessee, 1.2%Mississippi, 2.2%Alabama, 0.9%Florida, 1.9%Georgia, 2.8%South Carolina, 2.0%North Carolina, 1.7%Virginia, 1.4%District of Columbia, 0.5%West Virginia, 0.8%Maryland, 1.5%Delaware, 1.7%Wisconsin, 0.9%Illinois, 1.0%Michigan, 1.7%Indiana, 1.9%Ohio, 0.7%Pennsylvania, 0.5%New Jersey, 1.9%New York, 0.9%Connecticut, 1.4%Rhode Island, 0.2%Massachusetts, 1.2%Vermont, 1.5%New Hampshire, 1.1%Maine, 0.8%

 

Percentage change in nonfarm payroll employment by state, seasonally adjusted, July 2012–July 2013

State

Percent change in nonfarm employment from July 2012 to July 2013 (p)

Statistical significance

Alabama

0.9

Not statistically significant change

Alaska

-0.5

Not statistically significant change

Arizona

3.1

Statistically significant, increase

Arkansas

1.2

Not statistically significant change

California

1.6

Statistically significant, increase

Colorado

2.7

Statistically significant, increase

Connecticut

1.4

Statistically significant, increase

Delaware

1.7

Statistically significant, increase

District of Columbia

0.5

Not statistically significant change

Florida

1.9

Statistically significant, increase

Georgia

2.8

Statistically significant, increase

Hawaii

1.0

Not statistically significant change

Idaho

2.7

Statistically significant, increase

Illinois

1.0

Statistically significant, increase

Indiana

1.9

Statistically significant, increase

Iowa

1.7

Statistically significant, increase

Kansas

1.2

Statistically significant, increase

Kentucky

1.0

Statistically significant, increase

Louisiana

1.2

Statistically significant, increase

Maine

0.8

Not statistically significant change

Maryland

1.5

Statistically significant, increase

Massachusetts

1.2

Statistically significant, increase

Michigan

1.7

Statistically significant, increase

Minnesota

2.0

Statistically significant, increase

Mississippi

2.2

Statistically significant, increase

Missouri

1.8

Statistically significant, increase

Montana

1.9

Statistically significant, increase

Nebraska

0.7

Not statistically significant change

Nevada

1.3

Not statistically significant change

New Hampshire

1.1

Not statistically significant change

New Jersey

1.9

Statistically significant, increase

New Mexico

1.0

Not statistically significant change

New York

0.9

Statistically significant, increase

North Carolina

1.7

Statistically significant, increase

North Dakota

2.7

Statistically significant, increase

Ohio

0.7

Not statistically significant change

Oklahoma

0.6

Not statistically significant change

Oregon

1.7

Statistically significant, increase

Pennsylvania

0.5

Not statistically significant change

Rhode Island

0.2

Not statistically significant change

South Carolina

2.0

Statistically significant, increase

South Dakota

1.1

Not statistically significant change

Tennessee

1.2

Statistically significant, increase

Texas

2.7

Statistically significant, increase

Utah

3.2

Statistically significant, increase

Vermont

1.5

Not statistically significant change

Virginia

1.4

Statistically significant, increase

Washington

2.3

Statistically significant, increase

West Virginia

0.8

Not statistically significant change

Wisconsin

0.9

Statistically significant, increase

Wyoming

0.9

Not statistically significant change

Footnotes:
(p) = preliminary.
 

Over the year, 33 states had statistically significant changes in employment, all of which were positive. Among those states, the largest over-the-year job increase occurred in Texas (+293,000, or +2.7 percent), followed by California (+236,400, or +1.6 percent) and Florida (+143,700, or +1.9 percent).

In July 2013, 16 states had statistically significant over-the-month changes in employment, 12 of which were increases. The largest statistically significant job gain occurred in California (+38,100), followed by Georgia (+30,900) and Florida (+27,600). The largest statistically significant job decreases occurred in New Jersey (−11,800) and Nevada (−10,200).

These data are from the Current Employment Statistics (State and Metro Area) program. Data for the most recent month are preliminary and subject to revision. To learn more, see "Regional and State Employment and Unemployment — July 2013" (HTML) (PDF), news release USDL-13-1697.

SUGGESTED CITATION

Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, The Economics Daily, Utah has largest over-the-year percentage increase in employment among states, July 2013 at https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2013/ted_20130821.htm (visited February 28, 2026).