Charting International Labor Comparisons (2012 Edition)
These are interactive charts. Mouse over to see data labels. Click the legend items to hide and show data displayed.
Section 3a: Competitiveness in manufacturing — Compensation costs Previous | Next
On This Page
- Chart 3.1 - Hourly compensation costs in manufacturing, selected countries, in U.S. dollars, 2010 (HTML) (PDF)
- Chart 3.2 - Hourly compensation costs in manufacturing, selected countries and regions, in U.S. dollars, 2010 (HTML) (PDF)
- Chart 3.3 - Percent change in hourly compensation costs in manufacturing and exchange rates, selected countries, 2009–2010 (HTML) (PDF)
- Chart 3.4 - Growth in manufacturing hourly compensation costs, selected countries, average annual rates, 2000–2007 and 2007–2010 (HTML) (PDF)
- Chart 3.5 - Hourly compensation costs in manufacturing, selected countries and regions, annual percent changes, 2006–2010 (HTML) (PDF)
- Chart 3.6 - Components of hourly compensation costs in manufacturing, selected countries, in percent, 2010 (HTML) (PDF)
- Section 3a Notes - Sources and definitions
Go to:
Three indicators of international competitiveness in the manufactured goods sector are hourly compensation costs, labor productivity, and unit labor costs.
Hourly compensation measures employers’ average hourly labor costs in the manufacturing sector.
Labor productivity (output per hour worked) measures how effectively hours worked are converted into output. Unit labor costs measure the cost of labor compensation required to produce one unit of output. Increases in labor productivity indicate that a country's workforce is becoming more efficient, and declines in unit labor costs indicate that an economy is becoming more cost competitive.
Chart 3.1
Hourly compensation costs in manufacturing,
selected countries, in U.S. dollars, 2010
|
2010 Hourly compensation costs |
Norway |
57.53 |
Switzerland |
53.20 |
Belgium |
50.70 |
Denmark |
45.48 |
Sweden |
43.81 |
Germany |
43.76 |
Finland |
42.30 |
Austria |
41.07 |
Netherlands |
40.92 |
Australia |
40.60 |
France |
40.55 |
Ireland |
36.30 |
Canada |
35.67 |
United States |
34.74 |
Italy |
33.41 |
Japan |
31.99 |
United Kingdom |
29.44 |
Spain |
26.60 |
Greece |
22.19 |
New Zealand |
20.57 |
Israel |
20.12 |
Singapore |
19.10 |
South Korea |
16.62 |
Argentina |
12.66 |
Portugal |
11.72 |
Czech Republic |
11.50 |
Slovakia |
10.72 |
Brazil |
10.08 |
Estonia |
9.47 |
Hungary |
8.40 |
Taiwan |
8.36 |
Poland |
8.01 |
Mexico |
6.23 |
Philippines |
1.90 |
India |
1.17 |
China |
1.06 |
- The nine countries with the highest manufacturing hourly compensation costs were all in Europe.
- Compensation costs in Norway were 1.7 times larger than compensation costs in the United States and more than 50 times larger than those in China.
- Compensation costs in China and India have been growing faster than those in the United States in recent years, but were still less than 4 percent of the U.S. level.
Back to Top
Chart 3.2
Hourly compensation costs in manufacturing,
selected countries and regions, in U.S. dollars, 2010
|
2010 Hourly compensation costs |
Northern Europe |
47.02 |
Western Europe |
40.75 |
United States |
34.74 |
Southern Europe |
30.24 |
Asia |
22.16 |
Eastern Europe |
9.30 |
Latin America |
6.86 |
India |
1.17 |
China |
1.06 |
- Compensation costs in Northern Europe were, on average, $12 higher than compensation costs in the United States, while those in Latin America were $28 lower than the U.S. level.
- Eastern European countries, on average, had the lowest hourly compensation costs in Europe, at $38 below the Northern European level.
- Compensation costs in China were only 5 percent of compensation costs in other Asian countries.
Back to Top
Chart 3.3
Percentage change in hourly compensation costs in manufacturing and exchange rates, selected countries, 2009-2010
|
Percent change in exchange rate |
Percent change in hourly compensation costs in national currency units |
Percent change in hourly compensation costs in U.S. dollars |
Argentina |
-4.8 |
31.0 |
24.8 |
Brazil |
13.5 |
9.2 |
23.9 |
Australia |
16.1 |
2.1 |
18.5 |
Canada |
10.8 |
5.7 |
17.1 |
New Zealand |
13.5 |
2.7 |
16.5 |
South Korea |
10.3 |
3.8 |
14.5 |
Philippines |
5.7 |
4.8 |
10.8 |
Mexico |
6.9 |
2.3 |
9.4 |
Israel |
5.2 |
3.9 |
9.3 |
Singapore |
6.7 |
2.0 |
8.9 |
Norway |
4.1 |
4.3 |
8.6 |
Sweden |
6.2 |
1.3 |
7.7 |
Taiwan |
4.8 |
2.6 |
7.5 |
Poland |
3.5 |
3.3 |
6.9 |
Japan |
6.7 |
-1.3 |
5.4 |
United States |
0.0 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
Switzerland |
4.1 |
-2.3 |
1.7 |
Czech Republic |
-0.2 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
United Kingdom |
-1.3 |
1.2 |
-0.1 |
Greece |
-4.8 |
3.4 |
-1.6 |
Italy |
-4.8 |
2.8 |
-2.2 |
Denmark |
-4.8 |
2.7 |
-2.2 |
Hungary |
-2.7 |
0.0 |
-2.7 |
France |
-4.8 |
1.8 |
-3.1 |
Portugal |
-4.8 |
1.6 |
-3.4 |
Belgium |
-4.8 |
1.3 |
-3.6 |
Finland |
-4.8 |
1.2 |
-3.7 |
Netherlands |
-4.8 |
1.2 |
-3.7 |
Spain |
-4.8 |
0.6 |
-4.3 |
Ireland |
-4.8 |
0.3 |
-4.6 |
Slovakia |
-4.8 |
0.2 |
-4.6 |
Germany |
-4.8 |
0.2 |
-4.6 |
Estonia |
-4.7 |
-0.9 |
-5.5 |
Austria |
-4.8 |
-1.9 |
-6.6 |
- From 2009 to 2010, many European currencies lost value against the U.S. dollar, causing widespread declines in dollar-denominated compensation costs in Europe.
- Austria and Estonia experienced currency depreciation along with declining compensation costs in national currency, leading to even larger drops in U.S.-dollar costs.
- U.S.-dollar hourly compensation costs for all selected countries outside Europe increased much faster than those costs in the United States.
Back to Top
Chart 3.4
Growth in manufacturing hourly compensation costs, selected countries, average annual rates, 2000-2007 and 2007-2010
|
2000-2007 |
2007-2010 |
Argentina |
17.4 |
26.0 |
Brazil |
8.2 |
8.7 |
Poland |
5.1 |
5.5 |
Greece |
4.4 |
5.4 |
Mexico |
6.1 |
5.3 |
Philippines |
7.6 |
5.3 |
Slovakia |
8.4 |
5.0 |
Norway |
5.0 |
4.6 |
Israel |
3.1 |
4.6 |
Estonia |
12.5 |
4.2 |
Finland |
4.1 |
3.8 |
Spain |
4.3 |
3.6 |
Czech Republic |
6.1 |
3.4 |
Ireland |
5.3 |
3.3 |
Sweden |
4.3 |
3.2 |
Singapore |
2.3 |
3.2 |
New Zealand |
3.6 |
3.2 |
Hungary |
9.7 |
3.1 |
Belgium |
2.9 |
3.1 |
Portugal |
3.5 |
3.1 |
Denmark |
3.6 |
3.1 |
Italy |
3.7 |
3.0 |
Netherlands |
3.2 |
2.8 |
Australia |
5.2 |
2.7 |
United States |
3.6 |
2.7 |
United Kingdom |
3.7 |
2.7 |
Austria |
2.5 |
2.6 |
Canada |
3.0 |
2.5 |
France |
3.0 |
2.3 |
Switzerland |
2.2 |
1.9 |
South Korea |
7.4 |
1.8 |
Germany |
2.0 |
1.3 |
Japan |
0.5 |
-0.2 |
Taiwan |
2.4 |
-0.7 |
- Most countries experienced higher growth in compensation costs, on average, over the first 7 years of the last decade than they did over the 2007–2010 period.
- Argentina, Estonia, Hungary, and South Korea had the largest differences in compensation cost growth between the two periods 2000–2007 and 2007–2010.
- In Taiwan and Japan, compensation costs declined during the 2007-2010 period.
Back to Top
Chart 3.5
Hourly compensation costs in manufacturing, selected countries and regions, annual percent changes, 2006-2010
|
2010 |
2009 |
2008 |
2007 |
2006 |
China |
0.00 |
0.00 |
17.62 |
25.16 |
8.24 |
India |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
12.14 |
7.62 |
Eastern Europe |
1.45 |
3.73 |
7.73 |
10.14 |
6.96 |
Latin America |
3.83 |
6.80 |
8.05 |
5.76 |
5.56 |
Northern Europe |
2.29 |
5.39 |
3.11 |
5.73 |
3.08 |
Southern Europe |
2.16 |
4.06 |
3.41 |
2.93 |
2.75 |
United States |
1.86 |
4.05 |
2.20 |
5.20 |
1.14 |
Western Europe |
0.61 |
2.80 |
3.54 |
2.57 |
2.87 |
Asia |
1.09 |
-1.33 |
2.82 |
3.48 |
2.57 |
- Manufacturing compensation costs in China grew the fastest, while those costs in the rest of Asia and Western Europe grew at the slowest pace.
- Eastern Europe and Latin America also experienced rapid increases in compensation, although cost growth in Eastern Europe slowed substantially from 2008 to 2010.
- In 2010, the increase in compensation costs in each region of Europe was the lowest it had been in 5 years.
Back to Top
Chart 3.6
Components of hourly compensation costs in manufacturing,
selected countries, in percent, 2010
|
Total direct pay |
Pay for time worked (wages and salaries) |
Directly paid benefits |
Social insurance |
Sweden |
0 |
56.6 |
10.4 |
33.0 |
Belgium |
0 |
47.4 |
20.3 |
32.3 |
Brazil |
0 |
53.7 |
14.2 |
32.1 |
France |
0 |
51.9 |
16.1 |
31.9 |
Mexico |
68.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
31.1 |
Italy |
0 |
56.7 |
14.6 |
28.7 |
Slovakia |
0 |
56.2 |
16.3 |
27.5 |
Czech Republic |
0 |
59.3 |
13.4 |
27.3 |
Estonia |
0 |
64.4 |
9.3 |
26.3 |
Spain |
0 |
54.6 |
19.4 |
25.9 |
Austria |
0 |
52.8 |
21.5 |
25.7 |
United States |
0 |
67.1 |
8.5 |
24.4 |
Hungary |
0 |
56.5 |
19.6 |
23.9 |
Greece |
0 |
58.6 |
18.8 |
22.6 |
Canada |
0 |
67.9 |
9.6 |
22.5 |
Germany |
0 |
59.0 |
19.3 |
21.8 |
Finland |
0 |
59.2 |
19.1 |
21.7 |
Netherlands |
0 |
57.4 |
21.4 |
21.2 |
Australia |
0 |
70.3 |
9.5 |
20.2 |
Portugal |
0 |
61.1 |
19.3 |
19.6 |
South Korea |
80.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
19.6 |
Japan |
0 |
57.3 |
24.9 |
17.8 |
Argentina |
0 |
68.6 |
14.0 |
17.4 |
Norway |
82.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
17.2 |
Israel |
0 |
75.9 |
7.4 |
16.7 |
Singapore |
0 |
66.4 |
17.5 |
16.1 |
Poland |
0 |
60.7 |
23.5 |
15.7 |
Switzerland |
0 |
64.5 |
20.1 |
15.4 |
United Kingdom |
0 |
71.9 |
13.2 |
14.9 |
Taiwan |
85.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
14.7 |
Ireland |
0 |
72.4 |
15.5 |
12.0 |
Philippines |
0 |
74.3 |
16.3 |
9.4 |
Denmark |
0 |
76.5 |
16.8 |
6.8 |
New Zealand |
0 |
84.1 |
12.7 |
3.2 |
- Total benefits (social insurance and directly paid benefits) surpassed 40 percent of compensation costs in 15 out of 34 selected countries.
- Total benefits as a percentage of total costs were highest in Belgium, at 53 percent of costs, and lowest in New Zealand, at 16 percent.
- For manufacturers in Sweden, Belgium, Brazil, and France, social insurance costs made up approximately 33 percent of total compensation costs in 2010. Social insurance in New Zealand, however, accounted for only 3 percent of total costs.
Back to Top
Section 3a Notes
Sources
Hourly compensation costs (charts 3.1–3.6) measure employers’ average hourly labor costs in the manufacturing sector. Average costs refer to all employees, are based on national establishment surveys, and are prepared for level comparisons. To permit meaningful level comparisons of employer labor costs across countries, earnings data from national surveys are adjusted to the BLS concept of hourly compensation. (See definition that follows.) Data for all countries are based on the BLS news release International Comparisons of Hourly Compensation Costs in Manufacturing, 2010 and the related time series tables. Also, see the technical notes and country notes associated with this release.
Because of various data gaps and methodological issues, compensation costs for China and India are not directly comparable with each other or with data for other countries. For further information, see the Country at a Glance pages for China and India at www.bls.gov/fls/country.htm.
Average compensation costs for selected regions (charts 3.2 and 3.5) are calculated by weighting each country's compensation cost value by its relative importance to U.S. trade. The weights are calculated using the dollar value of U.S. trade (exports plus imports) in manufactured commodities with each country in 2010.
Data on productivity, output, hours, unit labor costs, and real hourly compensation (charts 3.7–3.12) refer to all employed persons (employees and the self-employed) in the manufacturing sector. These data are based on national accounts and are prepared for trend (rather than level) comparisons. Data for most countries are based on the BLS news release International Comparisons of Manufacturing Productivity and Unit Labor Cost Trends and the related time series tables. See the technical notes associated with the news release.
Data for the remaining countries are based on data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) database OECD.Stat.
In charts 3.4 and 3.7–3.11, the periods 2000–2007 and 2007–2010 are selected to compare a time of global recession (2007–2010) against a prerecessionary time (2000–2007). The charts show the average annual growth rate during each period. Although 2007 is included in both, it represents two different annual changes that do not overlap: 2006–2007 in the first period and 2007–2008 in the second period.
Definitions
Hourly compensation (labor cost) is the average cost to employers of using one hour of employee labor in the manufacturing sector. Compensation includes (1) pay for time worked, (2) directly paid benefits, and (3) employer social insurance expenditures and labor-related taxes. Pay for time worked refers to wages and salaries for time actually worked, including basic wages, overtime pay, shift and holiday premiums, and regular bonuses. Directly paid benefits primarily include pay for vacations and other leave, irregular bonuses, and pay in kind. Social insurance expenditures are employer contributions to social benefit funds on behalf of workers, such as for unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, health insurance, and pension funds. Labor-related taxes are taxes on payrolls or employment, net of subsidies. Total hourly direct pay includes all payments made directly to the worker consisting of pay for time worked and directly paid benefits.
Productivity is real output per hour worked. Output is the market value in constant dollars of goods and services produced in a country. For international comparisons, output refers to gross output minus intermediate inputs, or real value added. Hours refer to the hours worked by all persons engaged in the manufacturing process. Unit labor costs are nominal compensation costs divided by real value-added output. Unit labor costs can be expressed in national currency and in U.S. dollars. Real hourly compensation refers to the hourly labor cost for employed persons (employees and the self-employed), adjusted for inflation. It includes all payments made in cash or in kind directly to employees and employer social insurance expenditures. It includes labor-related taxes and excludes labor-related subsidies.
Back to Top
Go to:
Last Modified Date: September 25, 2012