Department of Labor Logo United States Department of Labor
Dot gov

The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

North Dakota has largest over-the-year percentage increase in employment among states, October 2013

November 26, 2013

From October 2012 to October 2013, nonfarm employment increased in 49 states and decreased in Alaska and the District of Columbia. The largest over-the-year percentage increase occurred in North Dakota (+3.5 percent), followed by Florida (+2.5 percent) and Idaho and Texas (+2.4 percent each).

Percentage change in nonfarm employment by state, seasonally adjusted, October 2012-Octobery 2013 Washington, 1.6%Oregon, 1.8%California, 1.4%Idaho, 2.4%Nevada, 1.8%Montana, 0.7%Wyoming, 0.8%Utah, 2.2%Arizona, 1.8%Colorado, 2.0%New Mexico, 0.2%North Dakota, 3.5%South Dakota, 1.1%Nebraska, 1.2%Kansas, 1.3%Oklahoma, 0.9%Texas, 2.4%Louisiana, 1.6%Arkansas, 0.8%Missouri, 1.2%Iowa, 0.5%Minnesota, 1.8%Alaska, -0.9%Hawaii, 1.1%Kentucky, 0.1%Tennessee, 1.2%Mississippi, 1.7%Alabama, 0.0%Florida, 2.5%Georgia, 2.2%South Carolina, 1.8%North Carolina, 2.0%Virginia, 0.7%District of Columbia, -0.1%West Virginia, 1.1%Maryland, 0.8%Delaware, 2.1%Wisconsin, 1.5%Illinois, 1.0%Michigan, 1.8%Indiana, 1.5%Ohio, 0.5%Pennsylvania, 0.5%New Jersey, 1.4%New York, 1.1%Connecticut, 0.6%Rhode Island, 1.2%Massachusetts, 1.6%Vermont, 0.9%New Hampshire, 0.7%Maine, 0.6%

 

Percentage change in nonfarm payroll employment by state, seasonally adjusted, October 2012–October 2013

State

Percent change in nonfarm employment from October 2012 to October 2013 (p)

Statistical significance

Alabama

0.0

Not statistically significant change

Alaska

-0.9

Not statistically significant change

Arizona

1.8

Statistically significant, increase

Arkansas

0.8

Not statistically significant change

California

1.4

Statistically significant, increase

Colorado

2.0

Statistically significant, increase

Connecticut

0.6

Not statistically significant change

Delaware

2.1

Statistically significant, increase

District of Columbia

-0.1

Not statistically significant change

Florida

2.5

Statistically significant, increase

Georgia

2.2

Statistically significant, increase

Hawaii

1.1

Not statistically significant change

Idaho

2.4

Statistically significant, increase

Illinois

1.0

Statistically significant, increase

Indiana

1.5

Statistically significant, increase

Iowa

0.5

Not statistically significant change

Kansas

1.3

Statistically significant, increase

Kentucky

0.1

Not statistically significant change

Louisiana

1.6

Statistically significant, increase

Maine

0.6

Not statistically significant change

Maryland

0.8

Not statistically significant change

Massachusetts

1.6

Statistically significant, increase

Michigan

1.8

Statistically significant, increase

Minnesota

1.8

Statistically significant, increase

Mississippi

1.7

Statistically significant, increase

Missouri

1.2

Statistically significant, increase

Montana

0.7

Not statistically significant change

Nebraska

1.2

Statistically significant, increase

Nevada

1.8

Statistically significant, increase

New Hampshire

0.7

Not statistically significant change

New Jersey

1.4

Statistically significant, increase

New Mexico

0.2

Not statistically significant change

New York

1.1

Statistically significant, increase

North Carolina

2.0

Statistically significant, increase

North Dakota

3.5

Statistically significant, increase

Ohio

0.5

Not statistically significant change

Oklahoma

0.9

Not statistically significant change

Oregon

1.8

Statistically significant, increase

Pennsylvania

0.5

Not statistically significant change

Rhode Island

1.2

Not statistically significant change

South Carolina

1.8

Statistically significant, increase

South Dakota

1.1

Not statistically significant change

Tennessee

1.2

Statistically significant, increase

Texas

2.4

Statistically significant, increase

Utah

2.2

Statistically significant, increase

Vermont

0.9

Not statistically significant change

Virginia

0.7

Not statistically significant change

Washington

1.6

Statistically significant, increase

West Virginia

1.1

Not statistically significant change

Wisconsin

1.5

Statistically significant, increase

Wyoming

0.8

Not statistically significant change

Footnotes:
(p) = preliminary.
 

Over the year ended October, 29 states had statistically significant changes in employment, all of which were positive. Among those states, the largest job increase occurred in Texas (+267,400, or +2.4 percent), followed by California (+207,300, or +1.4 percent) and Florida (+182,200, or +2.5 percent).

In October 2013, 18 states had statistically significant over-the-month changes in employment, 15 of which were increases. The largest statistically significant job gains occurred in Florida (+44,600), California (+39,800), and North Carolina (+22,200). The three statistically significant job decreases occurred in Kentucky (‑12,600), Washington (‑8,100), and South Dakota (‑2,600).

These data are from the Current Employment Statistics (State and Metro Area) program. Data for the most recent month are preliminary and subject to revision. To learn more, see "Regional and State Employment and Unemployment — October 2013" (HTML) (PDF), news release USDL-13-2197.

SUGGESTED CITATION

Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, The Economics Daily, North Dakota has largest over-the-year percentage increase in employment among states, October 2013 at https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2013/ted_20131126.htm (visited March 14, 2026).