PPI Introduces Hedonic Price Estimation for Integrated Microcircuits Indexes

Effective with the release of Producer Price Index (PPI) data for January 2018 on February 15, 2018, the Bureau of Labor Statistics began using hedonic modeling to estimate quality adjusted prices for desktop microprocessor items within the PPI indexes for integrated microcircuits:

Desktop microprocessors are subject to rapid technological change. This makes it difficult to perform quality adjustment, which requires distinguishing price changes arising from changes in microprocessor quality from price changes resulting from other factors. The following characteristics are the main measures of quality for microprocessors. PPI collects information pertaining to these measures from publicly available sources:

  • Cores
  • Threads
  • Base frequency
  • Turbo frequency
  • Cache1
  • Thermal design power (TDP)
  • Integrated graphics
  • Beginning with this release, PPI is using a two-period time dummy hedonic model to measure quality-adjusted price change for the desktop microprocessor items in the integrated microcircuits indexes. The basic regression formula is shown in Equation 1, and the results for January 2018 are shown in Table 1.

    Equation 1

    Log Priceit = α0 + Δdτ+1 (Log X2i) + β3 (Log X3i) … βk (Log Xki) + μit

  • Log Priceit  is the Log price of the ith model in period t
  • α0  is the intercept
  • Log Xi  are the logged variables representing product characteristics
  • Δ is the time dummy coefficient
  • β2 … βk  are the regression/slope coefficients
  • μit  is the residual or error term

  • The two periods in the model are adjacent quarters. The time dummy coefficient gives an estimate of price change between the two quarters when the variables representing product characteristics have been controlled for. The product characteristics that may be included in the model are those listed above. The PassMark benchmark is also included in the model.2

    The choice of regressors affects the time dummy coefficient estimate. PPI turned to statistical learning to evaluate objectively the performance of different model specifications. Specifically, PPI used repeated cross-validation to calculate the mean squared error (MSE) for different model specifications. The MSE is calculated by using a model to predict the prices of observations and then finding the differences between the predictions and the actual prices. PPI selected the model with the lowest MSE because the lower the MSE, the better predictive performance of the model. Please note that PPI constrained the PassMark variable in the model because performance benchmarks can capture improvements in microprocessors that are not captured by the other characteristics.

    Table 1. PPI hedonic model regression results for desktop microprocessors for January 2018
    Variables 17Q4-18Q1

    Quarter Dummy



    log PassMark



    log Cores



    log Threads





    Adjusted R2




    (*) Significant at the 5 percent level.
    Standard errors are in parentheses.

    Using the procedure described above, in addition to the time dummy and performance benchmark variables, two variables were selected. The model estimates a price change of 0.71 percent for desktop microprocessors.

    PPI plans to re-estimate the hedonic desktop microprocessors model quarterly. Each time the model is re-estimated, the specification selection method for variable selection will be used. This may cause the model specification to change from quarter to quarter.

    Learn more about the use of hedonic models in the PPI »

    For further information on PPI data for integrated microcircuits, contact Steven Sawyer at sawyer.steven@bls.gov or (202) 691-7845.


    1 Cache is divided by the number of cores in the microprocessor.

    2 Passmark is a company that has developed a suite of software that gauges the performance of microprocessors.

    Back to Top Back to Top


    Last Modified Date: February 20, 2018