New job openings and labor turnover survey
July 31, 2002
New data on job openings and labor turnover were introduced this week by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Job openings are a measure of unmet labor demand and can be compared with unemployment, which measures unused labor supply.
The number and rate of job openings in May 2002 were substantially lower than a year earlier. On the last business day of May 2002, there were 3.5 million job openings, 2.6 percent of the number of total filled and unfilled positions (employment plus job openings) in the United States. This was down significantly from 4.3 million openings, or a job openings rate of 3.2 percent, in May 2001. Over the same period, the total U.S. unemployment rate (not seasonally adjusted) rose to 5.5 percent from 4.1 percent a year earlier.
These data are a product of the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Job openings refer to the number on the last business day of the month. Also, these data are not seasonally adjusted. Find additional information in "New Monthly Data Series on Job Openings and Labor Turnover Announced by BLS," USDL 02-412.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, The Economics Daily, New job openings and labor turnover survey on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2002/jul/wk5/art03.htm (visited July 23, 2019).
Recent editions of Spotlight on Statistics
- 25 years of Worker Injury, Illness, and Fatality Case Data
Examines detailed historical data on work-related injuries, illnesses, and fatal injuries.
- Occupational employment projections through the perspective of education and training
Examines employment, projected employment growth, and wages for occupations with different education and training requirements.
- Workers in Alternative Employment Arrangements
A look at independent contractors, on-call workers, temporary help agency workers, and workers provided by contract firms.
- Labor force characteristics of people with a disability
Examines the labor force characteristics of people with a disability and compares them with the characteristics of people with no disability.